Incentive as the driving force. Part of my job is to work with the ESL teacher. I’ve had students that speak no English whatsoever. At least a hundred, of varying ability of course, by this point in my career.Non-instructive immersion is fine if you’re just hoping to learn how to get by as a tourist. It won’t teach you really how to speak the language without any real help or a really long time immersed. Even then, you’re unlikely to truly learn how to speak the language as your are super limited by the contexts in which you can make meaning (likely restaurants, directions to places, etc.).
If you want to enjoy your immersive experience, then you probably want to at least be able to find your way and hold basic conversations with people. It’s much more rewarding to go to a new place and learn about them in their language than it is to figure out how to order food and find the bathroom before you head home.
It depends on what your goals are and how much you want to learn and experience.
Teaching to groups of students that speak no English is a challenge. I’m coming from the position of the first step being immersion, incentive is the mother of invention after all.
But, like you said, instruction puts a turbo charge on the immersion experience, and is crucial to helping these young people learn our language, not just order food. But, imagine trying to learn a language without a legitimate reason to do so. Your failure rate would sky rocket. Immersion, incentive is the most crucial element. Most ESL teachers, if not all, agree.
So, I suppose I should have made myself more clear in my original post.
Last edited:
)