Would like some input and opinions on these strings. I currently use GHS Balanced Nickels on one of my PBasses they are pure nickel also and I love them. I would like to know how these 2 sets compare.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Just imaging the fender stock 7250 bass string if you familiar with it , the pure nickel 7150 has smooth warmer tone, lack attack , a bit higher tension, smoother on fretting hand but stiffer plucking feel and notable lower output.
If lower output be your problem, I suggest you GHS PW7200L .
Hopehelp
I bought a couple sets by accident (7150 and 7250 packaging look similar).
I didn’t like them in the mix. I kept dialling in more and more high end looking for attack and clarity.
I like them on one of my Jazz basses. Adds some depth and warmth, removed the honk and provided a big smooth (but not lifeless) sound. Really nice on that bass--for what I want. But they aren't as good a fit on anything else I've tried them on. Might be great, but it all depends on what you want. They don't sound exactly like the GHS BNs.
I have a set of the GHS BNs, and they will have more definition and mid punch. I think. I don't recall trying them on the same bass to know for sure.
I found a set of Pre 2010 Mexico made Original bass 7150 (40-95) from my local music store.
Gold silk are real cool from viewing.
Old post I know….I think the 7150s are underrated, pure nickel has it’s faults. I replaced DR Sunbeams with 7150s ML on my jazz and it gave me the thicker less zingy sound I was looking for. I came back to rounds from flats so they sounded more familiar to me.I really like the 7150s, and agree about their general sonic signature: Good fundamental, moderate mids with a nice voice, and low treble content. Tension on the 45-100 set I have is higher than some others in that gauge but not excessive... I like the way they feel. They sound a lot like the La Bella Chicago Style pure nickels I'm currently running, with slight differences.
There's a comparison of the La Bella Chicago set, Fender 7150, and the GHS Balanced Nickel in a post of mine here:
La Bella "Chicago Style" Pure Nickel Rounds?
Sounds like you might also like the GHS Balanced Nickels, which are pure nickel on a round core. Keep in mind the round cores by GHS are not nearly as flexible and loose-feeling as the round cores by DR. I've tried the 40-101 set and found them to be noticeably firmer in feel than the Sunbeams 45-105. Being pure nickel, they're also warmer in tone with a subdued top end.I think the 7150s are underrated, pure nickel has it’s faults. I replaced DR Sunbeams with 7150s ML on my jazz and it gave me the thicker less zingy sound I was looking for. I came back to rounds from flats so they sounded more familiar to me.
Thanks, I remember trying them some years back and seemed fine but got side tracked with flats for a while. I might get 45-100 I’m taking a break for the 40s because I like a bigger .65 D string.Sounds like you might also like the GHS Balanced Nickels, which are pure nickel on a round core. Keep in mind the round cores by GHS are not nearly as flexible and loose-feeling as the round cores by DR. I've tried the 40-101 set and found them to be noticeably firmer in feel than the Sunbeams 45-105. Being pure nickel, they're also warmer in tone with a subdued top end.
I'm done with 65D's as I find them too tense. Getting too old, I guess...I like a bigger .065 D string.