svtb15
Inactive
- Mar 22, 2004
- 13,004
- 4,741
- Disclosures
- I play it all. Whatever works for the gig. Q+
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I agree that the stock pre is a bit too bright set flat. I typically play in active and turn the treble control completely off. It's a shame the passive tone control doesn't work in active mode. If it did I think the pre would be great as the EQ points are very good.
These are all good points. You can almost view the active/passive switch the same way you would an EQ pedal.I also run my preamp with treble cut off or just boosted from 0. No law says you cannot use the cut side of controls. And, as in Sadowsky's and Aguilar's OBP-1, the bass and treble are boost only. So I essentially treat mine as the same. Turn it to off, and bring in what I need. I actually use the cut side of the mid control, too. To help to even the level when switching from passive to active. I agree with the above, the EQ points are very good. In fact, the cut side of the treble cuts highs at a very similar point as the passive tone. To my ears. I try all positions of controls to learn the electronics' effects on tone. Use my knowledge for specific goals. And I do prefer to buy a bass and not have to change anythin. So, in tryin to avoid change, I use the controls a bit different. Plus, in a mix, those high might help ya cut thru. Lots of guys use boost pedals. This avoids the need for one. I use my switch for soloing, too. Passive is perfect for keepin an overdrive nearly clean, but active kicks drive up when wanted. I like the tone of the preamp, tho. So I am loathe to change it. I will say, tho, I've used the Audere. Very transparent. No solder install. And a great way to see if change is necessary.
I second this. I have two American Deluxe J 5’s. I had Audere pro JZ6’s in them. Eventually, I sold them and got the Audere Jazz preamp that doesn’t have Z mode so I could retain the tone knob. They’re PERFECT. I also tried a John East Retro J in between and wasn’t impressed. It had too much baked in tone.I might be in the minority but my favorite preamp in a jazz bass is the Audere. More transparent than other options but still extremely versatile. Easy to install too with no soldering.
An alternate perspective from a guy who owns 3 Fender Elite Basses and plays the crap out of them:
1) These are incredibly versatile tools: Passive = Vintage Tone. Active = Modern...two templates to paint with...which is rad imho..
2) A bump in volume can effect your perception...If you want the passive sound louder...turn up the volume..
3) If you perceive a bump in high frequencies, simply cut a bit of treble from the active pre-amp. The EQ is there for a reason...use it...
4) IMO, there are very limited scenarios where you would switch between active and passive during an actual performance. Furthermore, if you are running thru a house PA, the soundman will hate you if you switch. Ok...maybe hate is a strong word...but you will definitely elicit an eye roll because after spending the first 4 songs to get everyone sitting properly in the mix,,,you went ahead and went active thus blasting out the pretty boy singer and pre-maddona guitar player that he (or she) had dialed 'just right...'
5) If you like passive mode, just bump the volume a bit.
6) if you like active mode, just tweak the EQ a bit
Just one dudes 2 cents....
Here is my Fender Elite Jazz Bass review...listen to the active vs. passive sections..
Thanks for posting that, I believe I saw this review on another thread as well. For me it basically just comes down to the fact that Fender didn't make the passive tone control usable while in active mode.
Rolling off the treble helps, but there's a whole spectrum of tones that you can achieve when you can roll off the tone control, then bump the treble or vice-versa. It's something that I grew quite accustomed to on the Sadowsky (and the Sire, and the Skjold) but a little annoying that I can't do that on the stock Fender.
Not a huge deal, but it would have been a very nice feature to have. I'll talk to the tech I normally use and see if it's possibly just a simple wiring modification that would allow for it to work in active mode.
I am curious, did you ever upgrade the preamp? I have used the J-Retro and J-Tone preamps in J basses and the passive tone works in both active and passive modes. The J-Retro adds a lot more punch than the J-Tone, the J-Tone is more subtle. I agree, having a passive tone control that works in both mode adds all types of different tones.
No I actually ended up selling it. I'm more accustomed to having 24 frets and playing my Sadowsky Modern.
However, I was tempted to do this conversion:
That's probably the best sounding Fender I've ever heard - with JRetro deluxe and Bartolini B-Axis pickups.
For me the Fender preamp was too trebly sounding when trying to record, but when playing live through a 15 or a 410 cab, it was less harsh and provided some nice bite to help you cut through a loud mix. It may have been engineered with "live playing" in mind more so than studio or "bedroom" playing.