Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Fender American Ultra II series is here
- Thread starter JenderBazzFass
- Start date
I'm glad they finally figured out how to make the passive tone work in active mode, but they all look kinda cheap to me and the finishes do nothing for me.
I have never read anywhere that Fender moved the location of the P pickup on any of their standard models, and the Elite series came round about 10 years ago. It seems hard to believe that this would escape the notice of everyone in the industry and everyone in the bass world.
Apart from this, there are many things that could account for tonal differences between an Ultra and an American Pro.
D
I revisited the video with the Ultra II Red V and the sound is good (fantastic I will say!), better for me in comparation with the old Ultra. The 750hz mid boost is killer! The push switch active/passive is a good addition. Better controls.
I will try the new model (the bloks on the neck are aestetic features and I miss them!), but I want the new sound. Better passive mod, better mids, more stable neck. I'm all in!
I will try the new model (the bloks on the neck are aestetic features and I miss them!), but I want the new sound. Better passive mod, better mids, more stable neck. I'm all in!
D
Ultra II 5 Avalanche is my shopping basket, the wait has just begun.
Exactly!
The MIJ Hybrid II offers quite a few bassss with matching headstocks, some truly interesting finishes, too.
Yes, the Sinister Red looks good. Never saw any red quite like it from Fender
Obviously quite a lot of thought went into this decision.
Seriously though, I definitely like this.
Honestly, the Elite has the most luxury look for flagship model.
I dunno. You can only go to fine or dumb down so much on any of these basses. Nothing is so earth-shatteringly better on this model than on previous MIA models, seemingly $200 more than the original Ultras. In this past year I got acquired a new Professional II 5 string and it is everything I could have wanted. No, it's not active, but with my Fishman Platinum Pro EQ/DI box I have way more than I than in a built-in active system.
I've seen some reviews and already like the TONE.
Regarding the other cosmetic changes, the inlay blocks or truss rod access change aren't a deal breaker to me.
And I like the new colors. But most importante, the changes on the preamp made a pleasing difference. But YMMV.
Regarding the other cosmetic changes, the inlay blocks or truss rod access change aren't a deal breaker to me.
And I like the new colors. But most importante, the changes on the preamp made a pleasing difference. But YMMV.
There are posts about in on TB that you can find and search if you'd like. Essentially, for standard Precision bodies, J pickup is conventionally in the 70s position and the split P is in the regular position (for example, the Tony Franklin bass). For the Ultras (and Elites as well I assume), the Jazz pickup is in the 60s position and the split P is shifted towards the neck the same amount to keep the distance between the two pickups that same as it would be on a regular-Precision body PJ bass.
Most people don't care about small details like that I guess (we're talking a difference of .4 inches all). But I could hear it and it was very annoying to me (when playing; anything sounds fine to me when someone else is playing it lol). The Ultras (and Ultra IIs I would assume) also have Split P's with a non-conventional construction, but that's not anyone ever talks about either.
https://www.talkbass.com/threads/fender-marketing-propaganda.1611030/page-4#post-27598353
It's possible the difference is due somewhat to that, but I tried a regular split P in my Ultra and it still sounded a bit off to me.
Honestly I'm disappointed, I don't think Fender has vision anymore, sad!!!!
I believe the designers of the Ultra II are the same team that designed the Squier Contemporary line.
...... and the ultra II has no roasted neck but quad sawn .
I know it's an unfair comparison or seems rude, but the Ultra II could still entertain fender enthusiasts if it had a truss rod wheel at the heel and replaced the himass bridge with a Hipshot A style bridge.
Last edited:
Truss rod adjustment on the headstock? Cmon Fender... Everyone seemed happy with the wheel on the elites.
And color options are very boring. What a shame.
And color options are very boring. What a shame.
Exactly what I was thinking. These upgrades feel like Cellphone upgrades or even Sports video games.It's interesting as iPhone 16 to me
Teeny, maybe interesting upgrades per year. But never real overhaul of improvement
You'll get to hear one on the soundtrack for "Rocky XIX (Rocky XXIV after 5:30pm EST): The Creedening"!
Full disclosure...regardless of how they're made or what goes into them, they exist beyond my price threshold and will never be in my "big picture". In other words, I really don't have much say there.
That being said, the fact that Fender's top-of-the-line, off-the-shelf Jazzes have no binding and blocks seem somehow wrong to me.
That being said, the fact that Fender's top-of-the-line, off-the-shelf Jazzes have no binding and blocks seem somehow wrong to me.
