So if you guys are so against it, why haven't you created a petition or written Fender to address concerns with this move?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Let's see...what would their ticker symbol be?
MIA
MIM
MIC
FMC
GIT
BAS
STR
TEL
PBA
JBA
LEO
Time will tell...
To say simply Wall Street will ruin the company is careless. Lots of companies smaller than Fender are publically traded and have been for years. If they hadn't issued stock, they'd have been out of business years ago.
BIGEJ2 said:Fender has a very nice balance sheet, is profitable selling luxury items in a down economy and generates adequate cash flow to support its operations. Its debt structure appears to be very conservative. In general, I would say Fender is performing very well, especially for a global manufacturer.
I'm not sure where this idea of a high debt load and bail out comes from. Is it the large numbers that scare people, media Wall Street hype or ignorance?
It is so refreshing to read a non-hype post from someone with a level head and a modicum of business sense. Thanks for posting.
Very good explanation, thanks for providing that for everyone. Though I've never heard that options are typically bought by people who can't afford the stock, I've always heard it framed as different "options" for investing and pro's and con's to both in different situations.
I don't think its careless to "predict" that a move like this will ruin a company, but its careless to not see the potential. So you have a company in tons of debt that goes public to bail itself out... the hopes being that the bailout cash will get the company back on its feet, gets out of debt, profit margins improve and everyone wins.
The other possibility, in our culture of Wall Street greed and short term profit, is that everybody buys stock at X price to bail the company out, but no internal changes are made so the company keeps hemorrhaging cash. While the popularity of the stock makes its price steadily increase, in reality the company is still losing money and still failing. So right before quarterly profits are announced, the savvy investors and stakeholders "in the know" pull all their stock and make tons of personal profit on the deal... profits are announced and the stock price plummets, and all the Fender supporters who bought stock to help the company are now sitting on worthless stock, while the board of directors and the savvy investors grabbed their cash when the gettin was good. Since the only people who actually "care" about the company more than profits is the poor musician who bought the stock which is now worthless, this now doubly hurts the consumer, since both their company and their investments have went down the toilet.
There used to be words to describe this illegal process like "insider trading" and "ponzi scheme" but thanks to lobbying and the influence of Wall Street on government, its pretty much normal operating procedure these days.
BIGEJ2 said:I'm not sure where this idea of a high debt load and bail out comes from. Is it the large numbers that scare people, media Wall Street hype or ignorance?
250-odd million isn't pocket change