• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

fender jazz tone cap history

He is misinformed. The voltage handling capability of a capacitor has nothing to do with its capacitance, and will not have any audible effect on a tone control's behavior. The difference between a 600V capacitor, and a 200V capacitor, is that the 600V capacitor won't release the magical smoke if you exceed 200V. In a bass, you will never see more than a couple of Volts, so that is never a concern. In practice, you want the lower voltage capacitor, for two reasons. Firstly, it takes up less space, and secondly, it is a less expensive component.
Thank you, I am learning more all the time. I a bit ashamed I never bothered before, but life, wife and kids. Being old I get more time cos people expect less of me !
 
Has anyone ever seen what they consider to be an authentic use of the .02 (SX) red dime cap in a 1963-65 Precision Bass? Was Fender pretty consistent about the .047?

From my experience, you rarely see the word "consistent" used in the same sentence with Fender.

Saw a 1964 P-bass in Arlington once that sure looked original, but there was a disagreement about the .02 cap.
 
As well as running Warehouses, and holding professional qualifications in Logistics. I am/was a qualifies and experienced >Lecturer in an adult college in S.England. Leo Fender had to learn on the job. He didn't have computers he would have used a Rollerdex and learnt to employ smart people who enjoyed stock control on a day to day basis. If he ran out it would have been the suppliers fault. Leo was about the money and you don't make money running out of parts. He was a smart man that knew the more he bought the cheaper they came, but it didn't stop him substitution any parts that suited his objectives. So yes they are always the same and often different! Frederick34 I am a little confused by your question. Of course stock for any model is standardized- Sometimes a cap might fall from one builders tray to another, (So what, build it and see what it sounds like). According to age my earliest P Bass has a phone book wax cap. then various forms of wax caps. Then the red Dime 50 Volt as in Fender 62 P Bass. The yellowish Dime 50 as in my 1966 p bass harness.
 
The question was just whether anyone had ever seen a .02 cap on a Precision (that they considered untouched). Everything I've ever seen or read was that all Precisions 'should' have the .05 (.047). I came across one instance (at a guitar show) that appeared to be an original, untouched Precision with a .02 tone cap... thought it was odd.

Not worried about the voltage, from my experience, all were 50v until about 1971, when they transitioned over to 100v caps. But, during the transition (I'd say it went on for about a year or two, 71-72), you can find either 50v or 100v. I have no doubt it was that situation where there was just a bin that said ".05 tone caps" on the assembly line and the new order of 100v Circle D was dumped in there with the older stock of 50v Circle D. By 1973, I believe all .05 50v had been used up, and it was 100v for the remainder of the decade.
 
Hi Ragul,

only about the Leo Fender time ...

With Fender Precision basses I saw the same capacity (most of the time) but Volts ot +/-% "as much as can" ... (sorry, I'm German and not a native speaker).

I agree that Leo Fender used the same capacity as long as experiments didn't show any better (in his ears).
But I don't think that Leo cared about the "quality" as long as it lowered the price (with same quality).
If there were caps with other voltage or %, (too my mind) he took them. Maybe it was only a matter of what was available at his favorite shop?

The .02 change in 1964 is very interesting as (as far as I know), Precision, Strat and Tele stayed .05 at that time. This would have meant more storage costs and higher "buyer prices" ("1250/250" 0.05/0.02 may be another price than "1500" .05s) ...

Photos I have ...
1963: SK/.05X/50V
1963: ???/.05/50V (mustard colour)
1963 +/- 20x/.05/50V (same type as "???")
1964: SK/.02/10%
1964: +80-20/.05/50V
1965: ???/???/10%
1966: AE/0.2/20%/1kV (on three basses)

Seems to fit???

I think the early 60's (maybe 64) was when the P bass changed to .05 caps. Prior to that, they were .1 caps, going back to the first incarnation. I can't speak for the Strat or Tele, but they may have used higher values prior to that as well. As far as I know, the only stock values ever used for P's were .1, .05, and now the ubiquitous .047 (essentially the same as a .05 for all intents and purposes).
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobyoung53
There was an endless thread on this forum from a knowledgeable guy who swore that his 0.022 cap made his bass sound different from a 0.047 even when the tone was not rolled off...It was interesting and led to a lot of fights and name calling LOL!

My preference goes to 0.022 for the 70's jazz bass sound as it just rolls off the highs gently and 0.1 on a PBass as you can squash the nasal mids by just rolling it off a tad (great for Reggae). And that is pretty much how Leo had done it in first place. I never cared much for the resonant frequency of the now ubiquitous 0.047 cap
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2luvthebass
1962 concentric – as mentioned
1963 .05 ceramic cap
1964 .05 and .02 ceramic cap
1965 .02 ceramic cap
1966 .02 ceramic cap
1969 .022(?) tropical fish
1970 .022 (Ajax or Mallory?) blue molded cap
1971 .022 ITW silver
1972 .022 ITW silver
1973 .022 blue barrel cap and .022 silver cap
Why they now use PIO or waxed caps in their AVRI/Amrican Original models if it seems they have always used crappy ceramic materials?
 
  • Like
Reactions: jafp
Kind of an old thread but in the current thread about the 1959 prototype Jazz that is selling for the price of a house on Reverb the bass has a 0.1 uf cap. I put one in my Jazz also to get rid of the nasal tone. I really like it and it can get almost as deep as an old P bass with round wounds and can get very trebly if I want it. I want to be able to go from deep bassy to trebly in my basses. My bass is an AVRI '62 RI and it came with a .022 which I really hated as it barely cut the treble at all, I then put in a 0.047 cap which was an improvement but still didn't cut enough treble for my taste so I put in the 0.1 cap in it, the voltage rating of a cap does not matter at all in a bass as there is so little voltage coming from a pickup. Incidentally I got the idea from a reviewer in Bassplayer mag reviewing a Jazz copy that had a similar cap in it (he hated it:roflmao:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jasper Mortier
I did a comparison on a 60-ies Jazz bass: the original ceramic disc (± 0.02 uF), vs. replacement orange drops (Polypropylene film): 0.022, 0.047, 0.01 uF. In order to try to get more of a live situation you hear mainly the miked cabinets.


I have a '62 AVRI bass but it was made for the Japanese market so is VVT. Like you I put the 0.1 uf cap after trying both caps you tried (0'022 and 0.047 uf) and like it the best also I usually do not crank the tone all the way off when playing in a live situation but it is nice to have a nice wide range of tones to pick from. I grew up playing P basses and always missed that nice deep warm tone and realized I could get it out of a Jazz just by switching tone caps. Of course a Jazz is never going to get that wall slamming very present tone a P bass excels at but this is a great idea for a P bass player who wants his J to be able to sound somewhere in the same territory as a P. Nice video and great playing by the way.
 
Would very much appreciate any information that might identify the year model of these stack knob pots.


20240505_131337.jpg
 
Last edited: