• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Fender Rumble Club

There is no way a single 12 can keep pace with 210's, but until you try you don't know what it might add in terms of dynamic texture.

I don't know about that. Modern speakers and good cab design have made possible all the small rigs we have today, and a lot of folks are doing medium sized jobs with a single 12. which blows my mind. My issue with 12s is their sound - neither fish nor fowl, they have a middle of the road sound of which I've not been a fan, but mixed with the 210s in the combo might be what I'm after. Just have to try it and see.
 
Sam Ash has shown the 112's as being in stock for a while now...:hyper::bassist:
Invalid Link Removed
I'd romp on a pair of those completely unheard. That's the confidence I have in Fender & Eminence. I'd top 'em with a Rumble 200 head. I'd rather push an amp hard then have one loafing along at idle. I think you get much better dynamic response that way. More headroom doesn't mean much if you're not really using it. I like running my Rumble 350 at half volume. I feel that's giving me every bit of it's 370 watts (yes, 370 watts) of headroom and it's full dynamic range. My Rumble 112 neos love it and eat up those watts like ravenous wolves. The tone and SPL they put out is nothing short of glorious.
 
FWIW, I'm not one of those "matched cab" guys. I went down that road twice - first with two GK NEO 115s (love the cabs, didn't like the pairing), and now with the rumble 210s. IME anything can work, you just have to try it and see. There's really no way to predict it. Even with matched cabs.

Totally agree with this. The only time that I've used matched cabs is with this Fender rig, I was using 4x10/1x15 for years, and it sounded fantastic.
 
I'd romp on a pair of those completely unheard. That's the confidence I have in Fender & Eminence. I'd top 'em with a Rumble 200 head. I'd rather push an amp hard then have one loafing along at idle. I think you get much better dynamic response that way. More headroom doesn't mean much if you're not really using it. I like running my Rumble 350 at half volume. I feel that's giving me every bit of it's 370 watts (yes, 370 watts) of headroom and it's full dynamic range. My Rumble 112 neos love it and eat up those watts like ravenous wolves. The tone and SPL they put out is nothing short of glorious.
Don't mean to burst any bubbles, but the whole point of headroom is having power that you don't use. That's why it's called head "room." And IME the cleanest, punchiest signals come from lots of power, because the amp has a reserve to push out whatever you're doing dynamically. Having less power means you push up against the max output of the amp - the "head", and the amp clips and squashes. Meaning no more punch, because the amp has no more to give. Nothing wrong with that, either. Ampegs, for example, have a really nice compression when you hit their peak. But to be clear, it's not headroom. :-)
 
Did a couple of rock gigs this weekend. Had the 500 head sitting on top of 8ohm sealed 210s, these aren't efficient cabs but the head never came close to a saturation point, the LMII I ran previously was almost always pushed to it's 8ohm limits with this setup, the head feels to me like it has almost as much clean power as a 7Pro. To me the magic in this head is the clean bottom end, (high pass filter?) and the built in compression (similar to the BDDI without the mid scoop) which again doesn't mud up the tone. So far I'd say the head performs and sounds like a much more expensive piece of kit.
 
Did a couple of rock gigs this weekend. Had the 500 head sitting on top of 8ohm sealed 210s, these aren't efficient cabs but the head never came close to a saturation point, the FI ran previously was almost always pushed to it's 8ohm limits with this setup, the head feels to me like it has almost as much clean power as a 7Pro. To me the magic in this head is the clean bottom end, (high pass filter?) and the built in compression (similar to the BDDI without the mid scoop) which again doesn't mud up the tone. So far I'd say the head performs and sounds like a much more expensive piece of kit.
Indeed, if any other company had engineers smart enough to design this amp and factories capable of producing it at world class quality levels, they'd call it a 1,000 watt amp and charge a full $1,000 for it if not more.
:cool: Fender Rumbles Don't Cost A Million $. They Just Sound Like They Do! :cool:
 
OK I want to join in now. I just got on the talkbass forums a couple of weeks ago. I bought a Geddy Lee 2 years ago, and purchased a rumble 30, swapped it in for a 150. Plenty of amp at home, and small gigs.
Why sure, Mickeyb48, all Fender Rumble owners & lovers are welcome here! Only snobs are not allowed. Welcome to the Fender Rumble Club, you are member #375 :hyper:

:D Rumbles Rule, Baby! Yes They Do! :roflmao:
 
This week I will be relining the 500 with 1" foam and installing a pair of S2010 woofers. This will give the best performance and weight this amp could ever attain. It is about 2 to 2.5 cf and tuned to about 55hz. The stock drivers are a beta variant and sound like it. The s2010 will outperform it in every way. Is nice that they put in some lining but, there isnt enough and I prefer the foam for sure. The only thing I dont like about this amp is that it has a built in mid scoop. With the help of a frequency analyzer I found close to flat. The speaker sim out is even more scooped with hi and low rolloffs.