I feel a bit bad about saying the new Fender wasn't worth the asking price before. I've tried quite a few new higher-end basses last week-end: 1 Fender (new MIA), 2 Lakland (Skyline), 1 Warwick, 2 G&L (American) and one MM Stringray. Of those, the Fender felt the best AND was ready to play needing nothing else but a bridge saddle adjustment. The Warwick was second, just not my cup of tea. The 2 Lakland needed fretwork badly, I wasn't impressed with the built quality at all and they were simply to heavy for my taste, the G&L's had a weird bridge/nut positioning that made them unplayable to me (I really wanted to like the G&L, but, alas, wasn't impressed with those either), the Musicman setup was atrocious (but then again, I'm sure it got played a lot at that store), to the point I asked myself if it was really fixable with just a regular setup (given a good setup, I'd rate them on par with the Fenders).
Of all of those, the Fender was clearly, and by a wide margin, the best value for money IMO.
Where it looses is when I compare it to my own MIM precision, and why I said I've found them too pricey. My MIM feel just as solid, has good fretwork and, to me at least, sound more lively, with more character while the new MIA sounded a bit bland by comparison. Considering I only have about 400 buck invested in my MIM (although, I have to add, quite a few hours of work to get it there, while the MIA didn't need that work), it's very difficult to justify the price differential.