I’m a traditionalist I guess, so, among those, I’d go with the Squire.
Passive, classic looks, classic platform...what’s not to like?
The other passive in your list is the BB204, and I like the PJ setup, and the looks are in the traditional-type range, but personally the looks don’t quite do it for me. Just personal taste, YMMV. Also, I’m not big on ceramic pickups, which the specs I just read say this has.
As for the others, I personally wouldn’t buy an active bass, but I fully recognize that many other people would only buy active basses. It’s merely opinion and taste - either active or passive can surely work - but, that’s my opinion. I don’t like the jump in volumes, the need for batteries, the battery box in the back, the active tone...i mean, when I’ve played one no disaster happened or anything, but funds are limited and that isn’t how I’d spend my money. I want an instrument to respond like a passive instrument does. YMMV
The looks of the Yamaha trbx actually appealed to me a bit somehow, especially one I saw in orange. I wouldn’t buy it myself (i don’t need it), but I did think it looked kinda cool.
The Sire looks like a Jazz, and a nice one at that, but like i said, I’d only want a passive bass. Too many knobs
The Cort Action dlx — I’ve already forgotten what it looked like after looking up these bass models just now, and anyway I’d hesitate to buy any instrument called "Action"
Of course, that’s just me. Go with whatever appeals to you. They all have the same scale and about the same number of notes (frets), I believe. So, if they’re all in the same price range and have the same availability. it largely comes down to looks, tone and ergonomics. Get the one that’s calling to you and learn on it/play it for a while. You’ll eventually see what you like and don’t like about it. Assuming it’s not a complete turd, no big deal if you later head in a different direction.