• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Bass Fishman BII Vs. K&K Pure Pre Amp.

I've heard nothing but bad things about the B2 and its "cheezy" frequency modulation and no mid controls .....On the other hand not a bad thought over the k&k any opinions ?

I have a BII and a LRBaggs ParaAcoustic. The BII has worked okay for me but due to its lower cost, it certainly has fewer features. Good value for the money I thought - I haven't heard anything weird. Of course the LRBaggs is better but costs way more. You could also consider the Fishman Pro-Eq II or Pro-Eq Platinum.
 
I've heard nothing but bad things about the B2 and its "cheezy" frequency modulation and no mid controls .....
I don't quite get it either. Referring to the pared down eq -? It's a simple, basic solution to load a piezo pickup with 10Mohm of impedance, with bass/treble controls thrown in as an added bonus. I figure 99% of those using it are going into an amp with a front-end preamp/eq section anyway - so really it's all you need right?

If not, there are other levels of tweakability in the higher priced Fishman pre's.

The K&K pre's have got some negative reviews. I have one and I happen to like it. It sounds different than the B-II - that may be as much to do with the lower impedance (1Mohm) vs the Fishman's. I found the B-II much "cleaner" sounding - and a bit flatter or possibly mid-scooped depending on how I was feeling about it that day. The K&K is a little bit growlier, bit more in the mids, but doesn't have that squeeeky cleeen hifi thing going on.
 
Sure thing, Francois...

This was just my impression after using the BII for a few months, and then acquiring the K&K. I bought the Bass Max/clicky transducer network with the RAB+ preamp included, so my first use of the BII wasn't with the same pickup. I did use the BII in combination with the K&K pickup in mono - which essentially gives you a Bassmax - at a couple of gigs/rehearsals just to give it a whirl.

So keeping that in mind, I felt the BII had extended low and high frequency response compared to the K&K pre that I have. Again, maybe that's a result of the higher input impedance, but from what I remember the quality of the low end in the BII was a bit different from the K&K as well - a slight dip in the low mids maybe -?