• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

G&L L2000 vs Musicman Sabre

Hey! I had a MM Sabre back in the 80's and a fretless G&L L-2000. These are both great basses or at least mine were. Sometimes I wish I still had them 'cause they'd be worth something now. Both were great sounding basses, however the maple neck went wonky on the Sabre. I had the board plained to get rid of the neck issue, but I moved off the east coast and it messed up again. The G&L was rock solid and sounded killer. You can't go wrong with either of these basses if the neck isn't twisted up.
 
I've owned both. Still have the Sabre, they only look similar, but underneath they're very different.
Alnico (MM) vs ceramic (G&L) pickups, and a hotter sizzly preamp in the G&L.
To me the Sabre is a much warmer, and fatter sound. The G&L is a rather in your face/ballsier-mids sound, comparitively. Also *to me* the Sabre has a more tighter-focused slap & pop sound.
 
I've owned both. Still have the Sabre, they only look similar, but underneath they're very different.
Alnico (MM) vs ceramic (G&L) pickups, and a hotter sizzly preamp in the G&L.
To me the Sabre is a much warmer, and fatter sound. The G&L is a rather in your face/ballsier-mids sound, comparitively. Also *to me* the Sabre has a more tighter-focused slap & pop sound.

Thats interesting, I tought that G&L would be fatter. I have L1000 82' and its very bassy, almost too much.