• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Herd Thinning?

Dr. Cheese

Supporting Member
Mar 3, 2004
57,287
120,425
Metro St. Louis
72BC6012-6A57-40D3-BE1D-0F4F300EE57F.jpeg


I could be perfectly happy with these two, I know I am keeping my Super 5 and my SBMM was gift from my wife. To top it off, I sold my Carvin SB5000 to a shop, but the shop can’t sell it and they will sell it back pretty cheap. That would give me a heavy, but high quality J5. As much as thinning the herd makes sense, five high quality basses that total less than a one new Ball Family Reserve Stingray or Sadowsky Metroline is worth means making room for five.:bassist:
 
Right now, I have a dozen basses and the parts to probably put at least one more together. I kinda wish I could downsize some but, except for my Spectors and Dingwalls that are regular players/gig basses, they probably aren’t worth much to anyone but me.

Most are projects and parts basses that I like, but probably aren’t worth anywhere near the money I sunk into them to make them “mine”. Not to mention, but if I freed up space, I know I’d just do the same thing over again and start building more project/parts basses. :wacky:
 
View attachment 5054079

I could be perfectly happy with these two, I know I am keeping my Super 5 and my SBMM was gift from my wife. To top it off, I sold my Carvin SB5000 to a shop, but the shop can’t sell it and they will sell it back pretty cheap. That would give me a heavy, but high quality J5. As much as thinning the herd makes sense, five high quality basses that total less than a one new Ball Family Reserve Stingray or Sadowsky Metroline is worth means making room for five.:bassist:
It's not all that bad you have to look at it from the right point of view....(in side view they already look much thinner to me.:hyper:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN WOODMAN
I would rather make a parts bass.

I’ve got ten, the band is ceasing operations July 1 and I doubt I’ll be playing out again anytime in the next few years. Two gigs a week to zero.

I both need and want to get utterly ruthless with the stable. Would like to get it down to four.

That's simple: One bonfire and you're done. If you're after ruthless, that's about as ruthless as it gets.
 
Soon I'll be up to 3...but may well sell one when the new member arrives. I can't fathom needing a 5 when there is a fretted and fretless 6 to be grabbed, but that doesn't account for sentimentality or future investment value. My cymbal herd, on the other hand, has broken free of the fences and started to take over the neighboring pastures. If I thin any herd, it will be the bronze one.
 
I have ten at the moment. I think. Avoiding counting is the key to happiness. The upright and two Thunderbirds are what I usually play. The others are going nowhere for a variety of reasons. I just bought another for the first time in years. It is a nearly verbatim Japanese copy of a Ric 4001. Except with one truss rod so even an idiot like me can figure it out. It is pre-lawsuit, so I figure it is morally OK. And it looks like a 4003 I had a while ago and swore I didn't miss. But kinda did. And the copy was about 1/4 the price of a 1970s Ric in pristine condition. Maybe less. I expect to have it in my hands in a week if all goes properly.

So there is justification. Cost and space are small enough to not make much difference. I keep saying time to cut back, not add. Oh, well.
 
I currently own 3. So few believe me but don’t understand how often I buy / sell / trade. I’ve cut back considerably. I’ve easily owned 300 basses in the past 10 years. Most I’ve had on hand is 5 to 12 at any time. Ironically before the past 10 years I owned the same 3 for about 12 years. 3 might be my number but I’m still after a fretless! Lol!