I'm a newbie to the DB and just picked up a very inexpensive Engelhardt C-1, supposedly built in 1982 (the serial number is 30446). It's actually in really good shape aside from the fact that the neck piece is separated from the body slightly (about 1/8 inch). The neck is not loose in any way and the amount of separation does not change whether the strings are tuned up or loose. It's actually very playable in this condition other than the fact the string action is incredibly high -- about 1.25 inches off the fretboard at the bottom. Who knows, this may have been a deliberate choice for a previous owner, but the person I bought in from knew virtually nothing about the history of the instrument.
My layman assumption was that since the neck is fixed to the body in what looks to be a tongue and groove that has just separated slightly it might not be a complicated repair. None of the wood is cracked and needs repair, it just needs to be 're-set' for lack of a better term.
Here's some pictures:
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
So, any ideas how bad this really is? Am I going to spend more on a repair than the cost of a new EC-1? Or, since it's not loose, can I leave it as-is?
Also -- if anyone can recommend a good luthier to work on this project in the western suburbs of Chicago it would be greatly appreciated.
thanks!
My layman assumption was that since the neck is fixed to the body in what looks to be a tongue and groove that has just separated slightly it might not be a complicated repair. None of the wood is cracked and needs repair, it just needs to be 're-set' for lack of a better term.
Here's some pictures:
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
So, any ideas how bad this really is? Am I going to spend more on a repair than the cost of a new EC-1? Or, since it's not loose, can I leave it as-is?
Also -- if anyone can recommend a good luthier to work on this project in the western suburbs of Chicago it would be greatly appreciated.
thanks!