I was hoping someone could provide a scientific (or semi scientific) explanation for how a Rick 4001/4003 sounds the way it does, i.e. how it's constructed, the hardware used, the electronics used, the wood used, etc.
How would these factors allow a Rick to sound different from, for example, a Fender P-bass or from a Warwick bass? What are the scientific reasons why each instrument sounds different from the other when the average joe might simply say "well they're all basses so what's the difference?" I understand that hardware, wood, etc. all play a factor but how do these different factors afford a Rick it's bright treble and, say, a Gibson Thunderbird it's boomy low end?
Or to provide another example: If you took a Rick and compared it with another maple-bodied bass they would likely sound different. Why?
This is more to satiate my curiosity about different basses and why each model sounds unique.
How would these factors allow a Rick to sound different from, for example, a Fender P-bass or from a Warwick bass? What are the scientific reasons why each instrument sounds different from the other when the average joe might simply say "well they're all basses so what's the difference?" I understand that hardware, wood, etc. all play a factor but how do these different factors afford a Rick it's bright treble and, say, a Gibson Thunderbird it's boomy low end?
Or to provide another example: If you took a Rick and compared it with another maple-bodied bass they would likely sound different. Why?
This is more to satiate my curiosity about different basses and why each model sounds unique.
