• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

How I Decided Which Whitespace Band for IEM Wireless

When I needed to replace my cheap wireless system recently, I decided to purchase one of the major brands that uses TV whitespace frequencies. Those three were Audio-Technica ATW-3255, Sennheiser G4, and Shure PSM900. Plus, Sweetwater carries all three which made comparison easier.

The anxiety I felt in the beginning was which band version do I purchase that would work in my normal area where I gig.

Shure and Sennheiser splits their product into three versions. Each one covering a subset of the TW whitespace band. Here in the USA, that band is largely 470mhz to 608mhz. The ATW-3255 covers the entire range, but the receiver is plastic.

Anxiety generally sets in when there is not a good process. I didn't have big budget either. So winging it was not going to work.

The first step I did was learn a reasonable amount of knowledge of the frequency range. Found out the FCC tried to take away the T-band for auction which is 470-500mgz range, but shelved that in 2021.

Since I felt there was a risk in the FCC restarting this, the Sennheiser A1 band, and Shure's G6 band dropped off my list which primarily covers that range only. The pricing of the remaining Shure PSM900 systems caused me to drop Shure off the list completely.

This left the ATW-3255, and the Sennheiser G4 A band and G band systems. I preferred the Sennheiser for the metal receiver body.

Next I surveyed Shure's frequency finder webpage and the corresponding one for Sennheiser. It was clear that both had generalized channel availability, not necessary my location. So I did what all bean counters do for their anxiety or addiction which is to create a spreadsheet. I've attached that here.

The columns are:
Channel number (TV),
Station Call sign or available if no station
Station transmitter location
Station transmit power
Station Start Frequency
Station End Frequency
Station transmitter location GPS coordinates (you'll see why)

I used Shure's information on their frequency finder webpage for a start. Then obtained a list of TV stations that operate in the bay area.

Next I used Wikipedia to get the station transmitter location, power, and GPS coordinates. I could have obtained this from the FCC online database, but I found Wiki was quicker.

The start and end frequencies are just cell formulas since the FCC assigns frequencies for TV stations in a repeating pattern.

This showed me there are 3 available channels in the T-Band range (470-500Mhz). Darn, that dreaded possible auction down the road again. I have disdain for the government.

There were two available channels in the next range which is Sennheiser A band 516-558Mhz, and one available channel for their G band (566-608Mhz). It should be two since there is not a VLBA installation near me, and the closest one is about 600 miles away (Owens Valley, CA for me). I found out that TV channel 37 is reserved for radio astronomy, and the VLBA radio telescopes is using that frequency range. There are only 10 total, and 8 within the continental US. You can search for very long baseline array to know me. More impracticality from the government, imo.

Next I plugged in the transmitter locations in Google Earth, and pinned the locations of where I gig. This enabled me to get a view on distance and topology. I didn't have any "over the air" TV experience in quite a few decades. It's been all cable, and in the past three years, none at all.

What I surmised from Google Earth was it's unlikely any TV station could reach about 90% of my gig locations. Most of those locations are in the southern end of Santa Clara county in surrounding by mountains or large hills with no direct line of sight to any transmitter.

In fact, the powerful transmitters are all in SF city which is the furtherest location from my gigs. The closer transmitters are all low power stations. The T-band looked like the best bet, but because of the T-band auction being revived in the future, I put the Sennheiser down to #2 on my list with the ATW-3255 as #1.

Shot off an email to my SW rep inquiring on the durability of the plastic receiver. He asked those that use it in SW and replied back they said it's durable and there should be an issue. Since it was T-band auction proof and about $200 dollars cheaper, I bought it.

Now that I've been using and testing it for a week, I've found out that none of the TV stations reach most of my gigging areas. The anxiety was basically for nothing. If I gig in the main bay area, I won't be with the wrong band version. In fact, anywhere in the USA, the ATW-3255 will work.

The bigger issue for me turns out to be other wireless devices in the whitespace where I gig. So I recommend surveying what is being used in the places you gig before purchasing. These are locations using wireless for mics, etc., but require you to bring your own wireless gear if you want wireless IEM.

I hope this is informative not just long.

TV WhiteSpace Bay Area.jpg
 
GOOD CHOICE

I went with the Mipro 909 (just before COVID) when upgrading my Senn G3 G-Band (after 6 yrs of use) for $50 more than I sold the G3 for!
tbh - the G4 wasn't worth the upgrade price!
Had the ATW-3255 been available at that time, I would have gone with it, but given the reduction in gigs, I can't justify another upgrade near term!

The 470-507Mhz range should not be impacted by anything other than devices in the same spectrum where you are - not 900 MHz, 2.4G, not 5G, 5.8G or anything ISM band!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bonecat
A couple years ago I bought the Senn. After the AT came out I seriously considered it, and after a bunch of research ended up buying one for our singer. It worked well enough that we bought a second for our other guitarist and now I'm looking to offload my sennheiser to buy another AT for myself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: s0c9
I'm in the market currently for an IEM system. My SW rep recommended the Shure PSM 300. It comes with SE215's, which I will probably use as backups... our guitarist has used the KZ AST 24's, and highly recommends them.

Judging from the OP's post, there's quite a bit to consider, before making the leap. Thanks for the info!
 
KZ AST 24

I bought a pair of KZ ZS10 Pro's to use as a backup pair for my normal IEM system and I really enjoy those. I personally don't like the style of connector (they use a QDC connector, my normal ones use an MMCX), but they worked really great for few times I had used them in testing.

I did end up replacing the standard cable that came with it with something better though, seems the standard cable for the KZ's is garbage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spidey2112
I bought a pair of KZ ZS10 Pro's to use as a backup pair for my normal IEM system and I really enjoy those. I personally don't like the style of connector (they use a QDC connector, my normal ones use an MMCX), but they worked really great for few times I had used them in testing.

I did end up replacing the standard cable that came with it with something better though, seems the standard cable for the KZ's is garbage.
Few things in here I'd avoid the psm300 system I owned it and my $150 audio 2000 system sounded better next the qdc iem connection is more stable then mmcx those are prone to oxidation and loss of connection. In my experience most of the Kz iems sound considerably better then the Shure iems. I can also recommend both the kz zs10prox and AST models but as you said the stock cables do tend to suck I can recommend the Tripowin c8 hybrid or zonnie 16 core silver braided cables.
 
  • Like
Reactions: s0c9 and Spidey2112
I'm in the market currently for an IEM system. My SW rep recommended the Shure PSM 300. It comes with SE215's, which I will probably use as backups... our guitarist has used the KZ AST 24's, and highly recommends them.

Judging from the OP's post, there's quite a bit to consider, before making the leap. Thanks for the info!
I’d go with the Mipro 909 before the PSM300.. or find a used PSM600 or Senn G3.
Don’t waste your time with ANY of the stock buds tho..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spidey2112
I’d go with the Mipro 909 before the PSM300.. or find a used PSM600 or Senn G3.
Don’t waste your time with ANY of the stock buds tho..

Appreciate the advice, @s0c9! It's hard wading through all this, and I research with the best of them... almost to the point of never getting anything! Lol!

'Budget conscious, but still want to get the job done' is my motto. I'll definitely check those out!
 
Appreciate the advice, @s0c9! It's hard wading through all this, and I research with the best of them... almost to the point of never getting anything! Lol!

'Budget conscious, but still want to get the job done' is my motto. I'll definitely check those out!
My comment was based on you buying the PSM300 new! :)
It's not a bad unit.. just make sure you get the correct frequency "band" for you area.
Check the links in my sig for that.. and feel free to pm me w/ questions!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spidey2112
My comment was based on you buying the PSM300 new! :)
It's not a bad unit.. just make sure you get the correct frequency "band" for you area.
Check the links in my sig for that.. and feel free to pm me w/ questions!

Thank you, sir! People, helping people. I believe the SW rep said the J13 would be my best, regarding the PSM 300. 566-590 Mhz range, so that's the target for our area.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: s0c9
Now that I've been using and testing it for a week, I've found out that none of the TV stations reach most of my gigging areas. The anxiety was basically for nothing. If I gig in the main bay area, I won't be with the wrong band version. In fact, anywhere in the USA, the ATW-3255 will work.

I hope this is informative not just long.
Edit - I'm considering picking up 2 of these for my band. I spoke to the AT Rep and he recommended that I keep them in a separate rack away from my digital mixer (XR18) and router. Curious if you or anyone is using this in the same rack with a digital mixer?
 
Last edited:
After much research, and wringing of my wallet, I recently ordered the Audio 2000 AWM6308U system, along with a pair of KZ AST 24's.

They're well within my budget, specs meet my criteria for what I'm trying to accomplish, decent reviews and recommendations, etc.

Nothing top tier was popping up in the classifieds, so I can't see paying extra cash for recognizable name brand, new (especially, in this economy), so a budget-minded purchase prevailed.

Thanks to one and all, for your real world help and guidance... particularly you, @s0c9!
 
  • Like
Reactions: s0c9
Edit - I'm considering picking up 2 of these for my band. I spoke to the AT Rep and he recommended that I keep them in a separate rack away from my digital mixer (XR18) and router. Curious if you or anyone is using this in the same rack with a digital mixer?
I have ours in a separate box (a 4U with 3 IEMs, antenna distro, 2 wireless mics) from our mixer box (6U with X32 Rack, splitter, router) mostly because it's easier to transport 2 boxes than one giant 10U. For a while we weren't using our mixer, but we had someone else doing our monitors at smaller venues and festivals, but have since gone with the two box setup.

Other than that, if we had a trailer and could put a 10U on wheels to transport it, I would just put everything in one box and be done. I can't see a reasoning for putting them in a separate box other than that. I can't see it being an issue being in the same mixer box, assuming you're using an antenna distro.

Oh, there's no way to rackmount the antennas with the AT. The mounts that come with the unit don't have a hole for you to move the antenna from the back of the unit to the front for case use. It doesn't even come with a BNC cable to move the antenna either. It's the one issue I really have with the unit. It's like it was really made to just have multiples and use the RF Venue Combine4.
 
I have ours in a separate box (a 4U with 3 IEMs, antenna distro, 2 wireless mics) from our mixer box (6U with X32 Rack, splitter, router) mostly because it's easier to transport 2 boxes than one giant 10U. For a while we weren't using our mixer, but we had someone else doing our monitors at smaller venues and festivals, but have since gone with the two box setup.

Other than that, if we had a trailer and could put a 10U on wheels to transport it, I would just put everything in one box and be done. I can't see a reasoning for putting them in a separate box other than that. I can't see it being an issue being in the same mixer box, assuming you're using an antenna distro.

Oh, there's no way to rackmount the antennas with the AT. The mounts that come with the unit don't have a hole for you to move the antenna from the back of the unit to the front for case use. It doesn't even come with a BNC cable to move the antenna either. It's the one issue I really have with the unit. It's like it was really made to just have multiples and use the RF Venue Combine4.

Thanks for the reply. I ordered 2 units but not the antenna distro. The antenna extensions are out of stock at the moment. I'll get the distro if other band members want to get units (unlikely). I'm going to mount it in my rack with my mixer and router. It's an inexpensive one from Newark...plastic not metal or plywood so I don't think I'll have a problem transmitting a signal through it. I'll just experiment with it during rehearsals before going live.