Yet I still want the capacity to go soft if the lyrics I create demand it
That isn't a function of band size. It's a function of musicianship.

MM
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Yet I still want the capacity to go soft if the lyrics I create demand it

What about a keyboardist/singer? Is keyboard one of those of those things you can sing while playing without too much difficulty? I'm really a noob when comes to anything outside of bass and guitar.

Yeah, the more replies I get I lean more and more toward the power trio, but I still wouldn't mind the fullness a of a keyboardist. Whatever, I'll most likely pick members as I find them till I get a good set.As many as can get along with each other, and sound good. IME that's usually 3.
It seems like when the money goes six ways you need to be getting pretty good gigs to be able to sustain, unless y'all have outside jobs.
Personally, I've always thought that a four-piece, consisting of drums/percussion, bass, keyboards & guitar presents the ideal formula for performing nearly any genre of music. It's compact, yet highly flexible.
For an originals band, my preference is a tight trio format, if someone is also capable of doubling on vocals. Otherwise, four but with the instrumental core still being bass, drums, and one guitar, with a singer whose only concern is to sing.
I know what you mean, I see two or even sometimes three guys playing the same riff and it seems so pointless to me, what is the point of that anyway?There are bands on our same circuit with 6 or 7 people, and they tend to play redundant roles... Do you really need that third guitarist?
I always thought four was a decent rock band number; bass, drummer, lead guitar, and a rhythm guitar. Preferably the bass or rhythm guitar sings, and if no one can sing bring in a fifth, and have them designated as the singer.
IMO anything over five looks silly. Two is my minimum (White Stripes, Black Keys, Middle Class Rut), but one person recording all the tracks solo then bringing other musicians on tour is cool (Nine Inch Nails).
This is as good as asking "what kind of picks should I use"? It's entirely up to you and your needs/intentions.
Both bands I'm in have 7. One is a funk/punk group with 2 guitars, trumpet, sax, drums, bass and vocals (5 of us sing backup).
The other is an Americana group with banjo/guitar/vocalist, mandolin/guitar/vocalist, keys/guitarist, upright bass, trumpet, and two percussionists.

I gotta say, those lineups definitely sound cool (despite my general distaste for large bands), especially the funk/punk one. In my post I was disregarding horn sections etc., which I consider separate entities from the "band". And how to you deal with two percussionists?! I know they're different than full blown drummers, but still.
Also: thought it's worth mentioning that at full power my bluegrass jam band has three guitarists, a bassist (me), a banjo, two mandolins, and a vocalist...so I'm kind of a hypocrite.
Yeah, but unlike most musicians, grassers usually know how to back off when it's not their turn.