• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Bass How to approach counting in difficult parts

Sep 24, 2011
1,335
318
Hi all

back on Berlioz Fantastique...Often, we are asked by our conductor to make sure we (the section) count so we don't get it wrong. But when faced with passages such as the one attached, it seems more intuitive to "feel" the notes rather than mechanically go one and a two and "a" "a" ...etc. Question is: how do you approach counting passages like the one attached, or even others that may be way more difficult?

Regards to all
 

Attachments

  • Capture_Berlioz.JPG
    Capture_Berlioz.JPG
    17.8 KB · Views: 184
Hi all

back on Berlioz Fantastique...Often, we are asked by our conductor to make sure we (the section) count so we don't get it wrong. But when faced with passages such as the one attached, it seems more intuitive to "feel" the notes rather than mechanically go one and a two and "a" "a" ...etc. Question is: how do you approach counting passages like the one attached, or even others that may be way more difficult?

Regards to all

Please pardon my long, and slightly off topic response.

I hate looking at this spot. If you look at the actual rhythm, it is like -
1 - 2 - 3, 1 - 2 -3 or 1 - da ka da ka. Even spaced sixteenths. In performance they are sometimes compressed - almost like the first two of every triplet
1 - da ka * da ka *
This is, however, not what's written. As a student, In my foolish youthful exuberance, I once protested publicly that the whole section was playing the rhythm wrong when they stylized it. In hindsight, I learned a few important lessons in that experience-
1. Rhythm is subjective, performance tradition can influence how players interpret rhythm.
2. Awareness and compromise are vitally important to getting along in a section

And most importantly

3. Never verbally protest in the middle of rehearsal. It didn't go well to inform my colleagues that they were "playing the rhythm wrong!"

If the way this passage is notated is giving you trouble, I suggest playing along with a recording so you hear what parts can cue you in if you are flustered or nervous about counting. You should be able to keep everything right in the pocket and land on the downbeat pizz that follows. Try to listen to the melody you accompany here (hint: you've heard it before)

With this excessive, over-notation, Berlioz probably intended the player to use a spiccato stroke where the string crossing up is grouped to the previous down. The rest is a form of note grouping articulation (like shortening the second note of a slur) he might have intended a thrown spiccato. Play, or sing it with sluring two notes together once, then play as written.

In a lot of ways, Berlioz was very modern and experimental and, as a result, precise in his intentions. The string parts in this piece are full of "extended techniques" that explore the capabilities of the new bows (Viotti/Tourte) the French using - portato, eccentric crescendos in all parts of the bow up or down, jeté, Col lengno etc.

I would caution against playing the four notes too equally or too swung like a "shoe shine". it is a subtle phrasing/grouping and the notes are very short.

As to your question, read the part carefully, practice it, listen to a recording to really help internalise the passage giving you trouble. Pick up on any other parts that you can use as cues to help you enter correctly. That will free you up to be more aware of other things going on and will make you much more flexible in the ensemble than someone who is just reading a tricky passage for the first time. There's a reason why we play things much better when we played them before than for the first time.
 
Essential to subdivide the 3/8 into 6 so that you get the main beats (135) right ..so the part would go |--3456| 4 times, then |--345-|123 tiedto4--|, then |1 tiedto2----| 9 times. This way you will always be in the right place - if you rely on feel I suspect the change in bars 5 and 6 will lead to a late entry in bar 7. It is quite fussy writing, though, isn't it? In recorded versions I can't hear in the basses the very subtle distinctions in the length of note that are written into the score. As long as you make sure that you play the last note of bars 1-5 noticeably shorter than the others and your entries are always good I can't imagine the conductor being too upset!
 
What a marvelous tool Youtube is! "In the olden days when I was young" I tried to buy a second hand vinyl LP of music new to me. Luckily the orchestras I have played in professionally would allow you to have the real music scores several weeks before the first rehearsal so that I rarely had to sight read. This really didn't help with contemporary music for which there was no recording. In really complex music I will still now mark the beats (and sometimes their divisions) with short vertical pencil lines above so that I clearly understand the divisions of notes and rests in each bar. Then I study the parts carefully so that there are as few mysteries as possible with fingerings, bowings, shifting and string crossings. I am prepared to make mistakes during the first rehearsal but make sure that I listen carefully to the bigger picture, put faint brackets around passages to revisit, and pencil in cues of other instruments' entries.

Years of experience and having a good technique really mean something in an orchestra. They shorten practice and rehearsal times so that the second rehearsal pulls things together quite quickly. Try to be note-sure and fingering-sure ASAP so that you can give attention to watching and listening.

And enjoy!
 
Left hand? For me this is much more a challenge for the right hand. Also, I think practicing slow won't get you there. It's about fitting it into this quick dance tempo. Try singing:
uhm badop badop / uhm badop badop / uhm badop badop / uhm badop badop / uhm badop bop / badop bop uhm / bop uhm uhm / bop uhm uhm / bop uhm uhm/ ...
It's like a Viennese waltz but in the underworld, right? Visualizing the ghoulish scene while practicing can't hurt.
Edit: Scratch that last bit. I was confusing movements. It's a ball scene on this side of the Styx, but still dreamt up during a drug induced delirium, or at least that was the marketing:)
 
Last edited:
Hi all

back on Berlioz Fantastique...Often, we are asked by our conductor to make sure we (the section) count so we don't get it wrong. But when faced with passages such as the one attached, it seems more intuitive to "feel" the notes rather than mechanically go one and a two and "a" "a" ...etc. Question is: how do you approach counting passages like the one attached, or even others that may be way more difficult?

Regards to all
I would subdivide and look up what the passage sounds like.
 

Latest posts