I have a pair of those somewhere. Tried them in my Lakland DJ4. I prefer the stock Hanson pickups' livelier tone. They do look cool with their unusual pole piece layout FWIW.Another option is Bill Lawrence J45’s. They’re hum cancelling.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I have a pair of those somewhere. Tried them in my Lakland DJ4. I prefer the stock Hanson pickups' livelier tone. They do look cool with their unusual pole piece layout FWIW.Another option is Bill Lawrence J45’s. They’re hum cancelling.
Another option is Bill Lawrence J45’s. They’re hum cancelling.
There's a whole appreciation thread here: PART II: Bill Lawrence P-46/J-45 Pickups (BEST P/J Pickups EVER)!I didn't know they were. Any reviews?
There's a whole appreciation thread here: PART II: Bill Lawrence P-46/J-45 Pickups (BEST P/J Pickups EVER)!
In a studio type setting, I'm probably using a P.In a live setting, some hum from blending the bridge and neck pickup differently, like soloing, will likely not be noticed.
But in a studio type setting, the engineers will appreciate noiseless pickups.
yep, exactlyIs the only point of hum-cancelling pickups (on a J-style bass) to be able to use different blends of the two without added hum/noise? If so, then is there really no other benefit if you always run both pickups wide open?