• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join free Log in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

I need more tension on jazz with flats

RicPlaya

RicPlaya

Apr 22, 2003
2,703
163
51
The Mitten
#1
Treid Webstrings..too floppy

The GHS lites are breaking in, again too floppy for me.

I heard that tighter tension actually makes it easier to play for some people, and I do believe I am in that relm. I find myself craving more tension from my flats the faster I play. My hands seem to get tired for overcompensation of the loose string and wobble. Then again I do not want to play steel cables for strings, so I think I can stay lower in the guage and get a stiffer string and be OK.

Researching this section I think maybe the the Labella FL's being a little stiffer then TI and GHS strings may not work eithier. The 9050L's could be an option, but I heard since the guage is so lite they are on the loose side with the Labella FL's. Then there are the DR's which are somewhere in the middle too.

I have been thinking about 9050 ML's or Labella FS, but not sure and don't want to spend a bunch of dough on strings. I also have to consider the skinny jazz neck, it seems to be a little touchy in this weird cold, rainy weather too of the north. I'm thinking something medium to medium high would work.

It's hard to say without spending the money and trying them out. But if the Labella FL's, DR's, and 9050L's are anything the GHS lites for tension, it's not going to work for me, then I have the skinny jazz neck and potential carpel tunnel to contend with.

So basically it's the 9050L vs the 9050ML

and the Labella FL's vs the FS

Then I have to consider the Labella vs the Fenders.

Any help would be appreicated.
 
#4
I've recently switch from Labella FM to Fender 9050M set, and I'm liking the change. However, both are great but I find the Fenders a little less bridge-cable like, although I still like the feel of the Labellas.

Anyone know the cheapest place to find the Pyramid Golds? I'd like to try those on a different bass.
 
#7
I put fender flats on my SX Jazz and they have a ton of tension. I have only had them on a month and I am hoping they ease up over time. Otherwise I will try different flats next time. I do love the tone but they are my first set of flats so that could be my lack of experience.
 
#8
Mastermold said:
I've got Fender 9050ML flats on my 51 reissue Precision and they do the thump thing very well. But if you're worried about neck tension, be careful because they're stiff. I had to adjust my truss rod twice before the neck would accept them.
Click to expand...


Yeah that's what scares me, I wonder if the 9050L's would be better on the neck and still provide enough tension to play the faster passages and give me the thump?
 
#10
RicPlaya said:
Heard they are a little on the floppy side? How do they compare to other brands?
Click to expand...

Well "floppy" isn't the word I'd use. They're lower tension than the Fenders, higher tension than the TIs. I've got them on a P-bass and like them quite well, and have said before they're my second favorite flats behind TIs.

If I were you I might try the La Bella 760FL set. You'll get enough tension without overkill I bet.
 
#12
I have the 9050MLs on a P-Bass and a Yamaha BB fretless, which has a very thin Jazz-like neck. Love 'em on both, they have great thump and tone, silky feel, as well as very stable tuning. Yes, a truss rod adjustment will be in order. With the higher tension,lower action is usually possible, reducing fatigue and CTS concerns.
The Fender strings are a bargain as far as bass strings go, so why not give them a try?
 
#13
RicPlaya said:
Labella FL's ..those are the deep talkin flats right 104 e string? You know it's so hard to tell what to do from just reading and searching. You think they will have the tension I need without messing with the neck of the jazz?
Click to expand...

Yep, those are them.. Can't say if they're going to be too much tension for your bass, each one is different. I've put heavier tension strings on thinner necks that haven't moved them at all, and yet on other basses with thicker necks they've maxed out the truss rod trying to take out the bow. So you'll probably just have to try and see what happens.
 
#15
I much prefer the LaBella FS over the FL set - tension is medium to medium high. They seem stiff at first but once they break in they become more flexible IME. Perfect (IMO) for playing fast on the lower frets on the E and A strings.
 
#16
ibnzneksrul said:
I much prefer the LaBella FS over the FL set - tension is medium to medium high. They seem stiff at first but once they break in they become more flexible IME. Perfect (IMO) for playing fast on the lower frets on the E and A strings.
Click to expand...

That's kind of what I'm seeing. I find myself creeping closer and closer to the bridge trying to get a good spot in the strings where the tension is good in order to play the faster passages. In fact I am playing so close to the bridge I am not even playing over the bridge pup anymore, but between the pup and bridge. I think if I find a good tension string, one that is med to med high that won't be like playing bridge cables but have enough tension to play faster, without really putting too much on the skinny Jazz neck that's what I am looking for.

I swear my hands hurt more then they ever have, and I think it's from trying to play fast with floppy flats.

Have you compared the FS Labellas to the 9050ML Fenders?
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom
Back