OP here....
For the record, I'm well aware that my feelings make me a hypocrite. The reason(s) I don't care for fender are their nonexistent customer support, and, mostly, their advertising. Didn't Fenders used to be the best of the affordable instruments? Now you can't even find em cheap in the pawn shops. If they tried to continue that philosophy with Squire, they failed miserably, cuz I'm a punk, and even I find Squires unplayable.
BUT, I love my Jag cuz its so adaptable. I can go from blistering, rubbed-raw solos to a ballad with a few switch flicks. The neck is the fastest I've ever felt. Its three pounds lighter than my last bass. I love how resonant the nitrocellulose is, and I look forward to hearing how it'll sound in 10 years. I'm conflicted that a company I can't identify with can build such a superior product at a reasonable price. Why can't it all excite me so much?
Have you personally had problems with Fender CS? I've not heard it being either non-existent or anything but decent these days.
As to their policies regarding price, they are still affordable, and offer different ranges for different price points, from MIM to the Custom Shop. In the past, they were never cheap, but in the realm of the affordable for a gigging musician. They aren't out of line with the prices of other builders, IMO, and are not relatively more expensive now than in the past. Furthermore, Fender has no control of prices on used instruments, in pawn shops or anywhere else. That is a result of demand only, not any philosophy of theirs.
Fender makes many basses as well built and as useful as the Jag: the fact that none of them exite you that much isn't really their fault, though I can understand it might be a source of irritation to you.
Finally, are the Jags really finished in nitro? I wasn't aware of that.
I know I sound like a Fender fanboy, and I admit to loving different Ps and Js from different era (I also think the jaguar is awesomely cool looking and sounding), but I can't help coming to the conclusion that most Fender hate comes from the fact that they are so dominant in the industry and that they exist as a sort of benchmark for many bassists, and a kneejerk dismissal, a kind of a reverse snobbery or a desire to stand out from the pack results.
I say this because if they are simply unsuitable to a given player, i.e. they don't like their tone, playability, or model offerings, one would think this would be grounds for indifference rather than hate.
Why not just love them for the Jag and find other basses for your other needs and wants?
PS Gibson, Fender and to a lesser extent, Warwick seem to be the only brands that incite these weird tribal feelings, and all kinds of misinformation and hand-me-down opinions in their wake. I'm not referring to the OP here, just making a general statement.