• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

I'd Rather Be With You Envelope Filter

primussucks9126

Supporting Member
Jan 1, 2008
1,499
2,622
37
Bronx, NY
Does anyone know what Bootsy used on this track?

I know he used a Mutron-III, but I also know he's used EVERYTHING. Are there any filters out there that can get me that DEEP, gritty filter sound?


But it sounds too synthy to me.

I also had a micro q-tron, but all 3 of the ones I had crapped out on me, so I'm a bit hesitant to go EHX. I did REALLY like that filter though, but its been so long that I can't recall the specifics of the sound.

I appreciate any info/suggestions that you all might have.

Thanks!
 
One some tracks that the Mutron was used, Bootsy used the drive control in the less common position. I forget if its up or down, but lets say you get the MXR filter...you would put the mutron in the opposite up/down position.

I just forget which position you would have it in atm..

mutron, big muff, and something else...maybe micro synth?
 
"I'd Rather Be With You" is pretty early, so I don't think there's a lot of stuff going on there (studio version). That original Mu-Tron III is a pretty mean machine, and the gain is actual gain, not just sensitivity. It can be overdriven. I'm not saying the studio version of "I'd Rather Be With You" is just bass, Mu-Tron and amp, but considering Bootsy's own inimitable talent and funkiness, I wouldn't be surprised.
 
Anyone have any experience running any of the above with grit? Most of the demos I found (just a quick glance) only had clean sounds.

I like the form factor of the proton a lot. Is the wonderlove an expanded design, or is it its own thing? Seems to have a lot more features for not too much more bread
 
Is the wonderlove an expanded design, or is it its own thing? Seems to have a lot more features for not too much more bread

They are different beasts. Both great filters but different sounds. Hard to describe the difference but there are demos of both that help give you a sense. For me the WL is the way to go because of the effects loops. You can put all the dirt/fuzz/gain you want in there and still get the filter to react the way you want... oh, and it can go really deep and all wet.
 

Latest posts