• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Idle thoughts: why is the G string string "1"?

Apr 27, 2000
8,066
18,125
56
Austin, TX
I installed some Labella strings last night, and they have those little handy die on them that tell you which is which (even though it's obvious). And it made me wonder - when you see tab, instructional books or setup guides that reference the strings on a 4-string bass, they always call the G string "1" and the E string "4." I believe this is true of 5 strings and guitars as well. It makes no sense to me, which might be just because I am a bassist. To me, just like I read left to right, I think of a string instrument from the lowest note up. So if I was in charge, the E string would be #1. Of course, I am not in charge, even in my own house, so this will remain an idle musing.
 
Interesting ... I've always thought opposite of you, i.e., highest pitch string being 1. When I tune, I always start with the highest pitch string, for example. But as for why, I wonder if the origin of the numbering is due to the violin family: with a violin on your left shoulder, the string closest to your bowing and plucking hand is the highest pitched string.
 
Interesting ... I've always thought opposite of you, i.e., highest pitch string being 1. When I tune, I always start with the highest pitch string, for example. But as for why, I wonder if the origin of the numbering is due to the violin family: with a violin on your left shoulder, the string closest to your bowing and plucking hand is the highest pitched string.
Yeah dunno. I always tune my E first. When setting up a bass/installing strings, I pluck the nearest fairly tuned bass (they are all around me) and rough the E by ear, then tune everything from there upwards, then when I am done go back and precise tune with a tuner. Whatever, I mean nothing is "right," so this could just be me!
 
Yeah dunno. I always tune my E first. When setting up a bass/installing strings, I pluck the nearest fairly tuned bass (they are all around me) and rough the E by ear, then tune everything from there upwards, then when I am done go back and precise tune with a tuner. Whatever, I mean nothing is "right," so this could just be me!
I'm really curious as to the origin of the numbering now .. I've never really thought about it before lol :)
 
Likewise for the High C.
The same problem exists with numbering them from the top. If the highest string is always 1, then "1" isn't a fixed frequency/string. If the lowest string is always "1", same thing but reversed. The issue isn't putting an absolute number on each string/frequency; I don't think the current way of doing is attempting to do that either (that's why notes have letters). The question is whether you start at the top or the bottom of whatever instrument/number of strings you have.
 
Smallest string gets smallest number. Makes sense to me.

When I taught, that was pretty easy to convey. But the highest pitch string being the lowest in relation to the floor caused all manner of confusion with beginners.
Acknowledged, but still doesn't make sense to me. Lowest string is closest to me. Notation even starts at the bottom and proceed alphabetically and physically upwards.