The other day I created a thread about finally understanding my different basses. But there is another big component that needed to be added, but the Strings section, I think, it the better place to add some thoughts.
Currently I have 4 basses on the wall, a 2010 MIM Jazz5, 2023 USA Fender P5, Yamaha TRBX605 and Sandberg Ken Taylor Signature. My thought is, that if any if these basses is to stay, each has to have its own sonic role and playability. Until today the Sandberg and P5 eclipsed the other two. But things have changed in my mind with some simple string swaps. I think I'm much more pleased with the current string selection on each bass.
Here's a breakdown from how they were previously strung and then today:
Sandberg: Sandberg SS 40-60-80-100-128... 45 swapped in for the 40 (much better)
Fender P5 American Pro II: Fender stock strings> Ernie Ball Cobalt Flats
Yamaha TRBX605: Ernie Ball Cobalt Flats > Elixir Nano 45-130
Fender MIM J5 (upgraded): DR Sunbeam> Elixir 45-130> (final) NYXL 45-130
1) I've loved my Sandberg the first moment I held it. Still love it 15 months later. Loved the strings too which I think lent smoother faster playability to the instrument. However I always thought that the .040 sounded a little "sitar-ish". So I got hold of a .045 and made the G string sound more uniform with the other strings. I'm trying to acquires some .045 Sandberg strings, but even for my rep Sandbergs isn't so responsive. I often play the Sandberg and these strings with gloves. Just sayin'. And BTW, it didn't sound bad with nickel rounds either, but I forget which. Nix to Black Beauties on this bass.
2) New Fender P USA. I guess Fender now ships their precision basses with rounds. Seems kind of counter-intuitive in a way. Had some EBCF's on hand and am so much happer. The Cobalt strings split the difference between the sound of a round and the sound of a traditional flat. I can play it with a much lighter touch, though I can't explain why.
3) YamahaTRBX605. It came with standard cheap D'Addario XL's. I almost returned it and then tried different strings on it. Until today they had ECBF's and I liked them on that bass. with the P bass it lost its distinctiveness. I had some Elixirs that spent 20 minutes on my jazz bass. I think these are doing the trick. These and Sunbeams have an innate "chime" that I think eclipsed the fundamentals on my J bass. I don't see myself going back to EBCF's on this bass soon. FWIW I also had some DR Black Beauties on it for a few minutes. No go.
4). MIM Jazz5. For the longest time I had DR Sunbeams on it. But as my ear became more in tune with the bass sounds, I felt that the overtones and harmonics made it a bit difficulty to hear the fundamental pitch. I had some NYXL's in the drawer and knew they'd feel different. Not so much. And I didn't know how they'd sound. But they weren't crisp enough on my recently sold BTB675, but thought it might be worth a try on my J5. Yes. The NYXL's improved the clarity and the touch on this bass. I had to add a bit of tension to the truss rod and for some reason also lowered some of the strings 1/64". Not sure the string height didn't stay the same. But it plays and sounds better than it did.
Bottom line/take-away: All the components of the bass itself mean little without considering the strings you put on it, and perhaps the amp you plug it into. I'm more convinced than ever that you can't fully judge a bass until you've truly explored it.
Currently I have 4 basses on the wall, a 2010 MIM Jazz5, 2023 USA Fender P5, Yamaha TRBX605 and Sandberg Ken Taylor Signature. My thought is, that if any if these basses is to stay, each has to have its own sonic role and playability. Until today the Sandberg and P5 eclipsed the other two. But things have changed in my mind with some simple string swaps. I think I'm much more pleased with the current string selection on each bass.
Here's a breakdown from how they were previously strung and then today:
Sandberg: Sandberg SS 40-60-80-100-128... 45 swapped in for the 40 (much better)
Fender P5 American Pro II: Fender stock strings> Ernie Ball Cobalt Flats
Yamaha TRBX605: Ernie Ball Cobalt Flats > Elixir Nano 45-130
Fender MIM J5 (upgraded): DR Sunbeam> Elixir 45-130> (final) NYXL 45-130
1) I've loved my Sandberg the first moment I held it. Still love it 15 months later. Loved the strings too which I think lent smoother faster playability to the instrument. However I always thought that the .040 sounded a little "sitar-ish". So I got hold of a .045 and made the G string sound more uniform with the other strings. I'm trying to acquires some .045 Sandberg strings, but even for my rep Sandbergs isn't so responsive. I often play the Sandberg and these strings with gloves. Just sayin'. And BTW, it didn't sound bad with nickel rounds either, but I forget which. Nix to Black Beauties on this bass.
2) New Fender P USA. I guess Fender now ships their precision basses with rounds. Seems kind of counter-intuitive in a way. Had some EBCF's on hand and am so much happer. The Cobalt strings split the difference between the sound of a round and the sound of a traditional flat. I can play it with a much lighter touch, though I can't explain why.
3) YamahaTRBX605. It came with standard cheap D'Addario XL's. I almost returned it and then tried different strings on it. Until today they had ECBF's and I liked them on that bass. with the P bass it lost its distinctiveness. I had some Elixirs that spent 20 minutes on my jazz bass. I think these are doing the trick. These and Sunbeams have an innate "chime" that I think eclipsed the fundamentals on my J bass. I don't see myself going back to EBCF's on this bass soon. FWIW I also had some DR Black Beauties on it for a few minutes. No go.
4). MIM Jazz5. For the longest time I had DR Sunbeams on it. But as my ear became more in tune with the bass sounds, I felt that the overtones and harmonics made it a bit difficulty to hear the fundamental pitch. I had some NYXL's in the drawer and knew they'd feel different. Not so much. And I didn't know how they'd sound. But they weren't crisp enough on my recently sold BTB675, but thought it might be worth a try on my J5. Yes. The NYXL's improved the clarity and the touch on this bass. I had to add a bit of tension to the truss rod and for some reason also lowered some of the strings 1/64". Not sure the string height didn't stay the same. But it plays and sounds better than it did.
Bottom line/take-away: All the components of the bass itself mean little without considering the strings you put on it, and perhaps the amp you plug it into. I'm more convinced than ever that you can't fully judge a bass until you've truly explored it.