• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Jazz and P Bass Pickup Shootout

Dan, this is awesome! I am curious about the flatwound test: Are these strings straight out of the box? Flatwound users (like me) usually prefer the sound of broken-in flats and once they find a good sound, will keep the same strings on their bass for years, sometimes decades. I so appreciate what you've done here, I just wanted to make the distinction for those who are looking into flats for the first time and using these recordings as comparison. If these recordings were made with fresh flats, they are not entirely accurate as to the final sound of the strings.

BUT I don't want to degrade what you've done here -- marvelous work, Dan!
 
Dan, this is awesome! I am curious about the flatwound test: Are these strings straight out of the box? Flatwound users (like me) usually prefer the sound of broken-in flats and once they find a good sound, will keep the same strings on their bass for years, sometimes decades. I so appreciate what you've done here, I just wanted to make the distinction for those who are looking into flats for the first time and using these recordings as comparison. If these recordings were made with fresh flats, they are not entirely accurate as to the final sound of the strings.

BUT I don't want to degrade what you've done here -- marvelous work, Dan!

Yep, you're right about flats. They're best when broken in. But for these tests the strings were fresh. I didn't have the luxury of waiting a few months for them to get nice and dead. :)
 
listening to the P comparison is fascinating in how similar they all came out. I've tried them all and noticed, at least in a live setting or demoing in a room, a good amount of difference between some of these, but it makes me wonder how much of it is purely from the body and neck woods / neck joint / bridge, and so on.

With the Precision pups, I always found the Nordstrand to give the best solo tone, but in the mix, comparatively it's a tiny bit scooped compared to more traditional pups. Totally workable, but a noticeable difference. The Lollar sounds vintage, but never quite hits my sweet spot... played quite a few of these on Nash basses, and never found one that spoke to me. The Duncan nails the vintage p tone in my mind, and its what i'm using in my custom relic at the moment... nails the vintage sound and sounds full and sweet to the ear. The most interesting thing here, is the Dimarzio... in person it has a totally different character than the others, at least when I've played them in Nash basses. I've done direct A/B comparisons with the Lollar and found the output and tonality to be completely different (the dimarzio being much hotter, more low end and a different character to the highs).

Thanks for posting this, i'm most interested in seeing the jazz differences as I have much less experience with those.
 
I'm hearing a big difference between alder and ash, maybe 1/10th as much difference between maple and rosewood. Big surprise, based on others' comments about fingerboard sound effects.

Thanks for taking the time to do this. You'll get a lot of requests for adding a sample with Pickup-X. The one I'd like to hear is the Lace Alumitone P pickup. They have a sample on their web site, but it's not a lot of help. But probably the most different-sounding P one could test.