TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Got to love that fast growth wood! Do a little reading on old growth vs fast growth (gmo) wood. You'll probably get a better picture.
yup sorry, didn't read carefully enough, now I see..... it is explained in the first post, he is illustrating the issue for picture purposes ...
... huh? ...![]()
The neck has a lot of flame figuring and doesn't look at all like the quartersawn neck on my Strat.
Please, link a VALID, peer-reviewed source proving the long-term safety of GMOs as compared to normal organisms. Actually, better yet, let's all stay away from hot-button political topics?Please, link a VALID, peer-reviewed source proving the inferiority/differences of/between GMOs to/and normal organisms.
Sorry, that isn't an optical illusion, no quotes needed, that is an honest-to-goodness manufacturing defect. Fairly common, only if quality control on raw materials and manufacturing are poor. I'd expect to see this in an abused Teisco del Ray, not a Fender.Fairly common among Fender-esque headstocks. The appearance of the "defect" is exaggerated by inadequate string wraps on each post...they should be hitting the deck to optimize break angle over the nut. The string tree(s) are a given.
Riis
Sorry, that isn't an optical illusion, no quotes needed, that is an honest-to-goodness manufacturing defect. Fairly common, only if quality control on raw materials and manufacturing are poor. I'd expect to see this in an abused Teisco del Ray, not a Fender.
That's certainly a fair question. I've seen it before, but very very rarely on Fender US made. Used to be quite common among low quality imports (like, decades ago). I haven't seen one that bad in a long, long time. But I'm not a tech who looks at lots of instruments (outside of my own herd, at least), would certainly be interested in hearing what the pros think. If that was under warranty, though, I would take it back, and if I owned that bass now, I'd be shopping for a new neck.Noted although I'm not sure I understand the reference above. I'd like to hear from our tech gurus who see these every day: just how prevalent is it? Is it truly a manufacturing defect or simply a long-standing design flaw that is considered the norm?
Riis
Yes, if the string goes back "up" by much at all above the string tree, something is very, very wrong.The fact the G string is entirely out of its nut slot seems to me to indicate a flaw. The string tree creates an angle over the nut but should not be necessary to keep the string in the nut.
Perhaps, but that seems bad enough that a functional problem seems likely in the future.The irregularities I see should not cause any significant issues with playability, although they are defects. The string tree issue is common in many basses, but the headstock looks terrible. All of it is mainly aesthetic.
Perhaps, but that seems bad enough that a functional problem seems likely in the future.
On Fender design basses, the face of the headstock should be absolutely parallel to the face of the fretboard (well, minus any fb radius, of course), if not, there's a structural problem.
Perhaps something like that could contribute, but the string should just snap from tension long before the headstock deforms.Looks like a B string is where the E should be. Could be the wrong string set is on the bass and in an effort to tune it standard is pulling on the headstock.
Noted although I'm not sure I understand the reference above. I'd like to hear from our tech gurus who see these every day: just how prevalent is it? Is it truly a manufacturing defect or simply a long-standing design flaw that is considered the norm?
Riis