I don't know, I bought the orig. bass pod in early 2000s new, never got past the presets or got to know it, then it sat on the shelf for over a decade really, now recently pulled it out 2023 and really dove in and finally got into discovering what it can do. I found it is excellent. There are many great and accurate sounding simulations that are extremely useful sound rich and inspiring. I intend to totally use it for recording my next music project. One totally flexible device to handle the recording needs I have for bass just simplifies everything for me and it's great. I can split to model signal and DI signal to two tracks, all from one box, love it. The other thing is I have a bit of a reference point to the quality of the models. I have a very similar SWR to the one that is modeled in the pod, which is paired with a 4x10 I have the 2x10 but when I switch to that preset in the pod, or when I put it on manual with that amp cab combo, it really does sound familiar like I am playing through my own amp. same character same range and EQ profile from the speakers, the cabs sound right the amp sounds right. it sounds "familiar" coming out of the bass pod which gives me an idea of how accurate the other models must be. my thinking is that these engineers put a ton of effort into making this sound convincing, and for sure they A B 'd amp versus model all over the place so I am sure the amp models are close enough to sound really good in a mix. I enjoyed finally discovering this gear so much that I found another used one for only $40 Canadian and sent it to my music collab friend in another province for his recording projects. When you are recording every instrument and mixing producing it yourself like him and I do, it is so great to just plug this in find the sound and have it plus a dry DI record to two tracks ready to go save time on mic'ing more stuff. plus, I can't buy all the amps in this thing: it helps to have that choice and the sound quality in a mix is more than convincing enough, especially if you carefully dial it in. That's the other thing too, when it's about the music first and getting the composition and production right, I compare the value I get from literally a $40 piece of gear now that takes me 95% there to the latest versions of these boxes close to $1000 that really, in a mix there is just not enough of a difference to me and so I don't feel the need to upgrade this to anything. In fact, I also got a guitar pod 2.0 for these same reasons. because I came across one for only $50 and with that putting a cheap overdrive in front like the silver horse boosted by a super cheap behr. superfuzz 300 on boost, gets rid of that "digitally sounding" distortion it has. The stereo reverb in there is fantastic. The choice: 50 bucks or the latest versions of that for over 1000. really it's a no brainer for me. Musicians that grew up before 2000 kind of realize that by the early 2000s many things in music technology like DAWs and Modellers and effect plugins reached a threshold where it really is good enough to do major studio work yourself, and, when it comes down to focusing on the quality of the songs you are creating, then not quite sounding 100% exactly like a 1969 fender tweed 1x12 but just dialing in a sound you really like regardless of the year and make of the amp, that's all I need and the price difference it is just really amazing what you can accomplish with just $40 spent in this case. So I am a big fan of the original bass pod and the red pod 2.0. The versions before any menu diving came along as well and it was just dedicated knobs for everything. that's another bit of brilliant engineering on the bass pod like the second layer of knob functions where you even have a parametric EQ and a low cut EQ that just cuts the effects buss and a sweeping mid for amps that had it and so many more clever additions with NO menu diving. I do enough menu diving on synths and Daws to want to also do it with guitar and bass. so yeah, I could go on and on about things I like about this thing but that's sort of it.