• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Maple body basses - why there's not that many?

Jul 12, 2012
1,035
488
Toronto
I happen to have one maple body bass, Ibanez SR370F, but none of my other basses have maple bodies (aside from veneer). I though that maple was quite a common wood, why not that many basses with maple bodies while majority is alder, basswood, ash, mahogany? Pricing, availability, historical reasons, something else?:rolleyes::bag:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 40Hz
Lots of older Spectors have soft maple sides on a neck-through body. However, the industry standard - like it or not -is either alder or ash, started by Fender of course.

Leo Fender didn't choose those woods for tone or mojo or vibe, or anything like that. They were inexpensive, finished well, and got the job done. We only started getting overly romantic about woods after the fact.
 
I always expected an all maple body to be heavy and have smooth lows overwhelmed by sharp highs and high mids. No so. My Gibson G3 is all maple and just has a very nice punch with even tone through the range. Funny that nobody's mentioned the all-icon: Rickenbacker. Range is very wide (Chris Squire to Paul McCartney). Maple is definitely underappreciated.

Leo Fender didn't choose those woods for tone or mojo or vibe, or anything like that. They were inexpensive, finished well, and got the job done. We only started getting overly romantic about woods after the fact.
Leo went with alder because in the post-war US, it was considered box wood and could be had for next to nothing.
 
Spectors have a Maple neck through design with alder wings, not entirely maple but it's in there.. And they're not the lightest of basses.

Current US Spectors and older Euros are entirely maple. And they are some of the heaviest basses out there. My old NS5CRFM had solid maple wings and was over 11.5 lbs.
 
Last edited:
Maple is really, really, heavy.
Go find one of the all-maple Peavey T-40s or T-45s and get back to me. ;)
So is walnut,but there seem to be more walnut basses than maple.

And concerning the T-40.How much do they weigh?All I ever hear is "They're heavy.They're heavy"without an actual weight in pounds.
I have a neck-through walnut bass that weighs 13 lbs.How much does a T40 weigh in comparison?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jg42
My Hohner B-Bass VI is only 10.5#, not bad for all maple, neck-thru 6 string.
And the '96 Ibanez SR506, all maple, bolt-on 6 string is 10#.
The Godin BG5 is all maple, bolt-on and only 7.2#
Lots of 'famous-maker' 4 strings are more than that.