If you had a choice of a Gallien-Krueger*MB210 2x10 500W Ultralight Bass Combo Amp or Markbass*CMD 102P 300/500W 2x10 Tilt-Back Bass Combo Amp which would you choose price having no bearing. Which do you think sounds better to YOU?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I haven't touched anything mark bass in a few years but i used to own an LMII and the traveler 102p cab. I currently own the GK MB210 combo (as a smaller light amp for when my Ampeg svt 7 pro and 410hlf is too big). The two heads are pretty different. The GK has a more aggressive sound with no real "flat" setting. It does the modern sound really well with a lot of top end sizzle and pretty big but clear sounding lows (I boost the mids and basically try to eq in a more old school sound). The tweeter can be either on or off. I keep it off, personally I think it is way too harsh. The markbass stuff has a much "flatter" sound or should I say un-colored. I think it gets a more authentic old school sound but in my opinion the markbass stuff sounds a little sterile. For me, my sound is ampeg. If you can check out the pf 500 and maybe the pf 210 cab you might like that. You should really check out both the amps you mention if you can. I have the GK but given the option to trade it for my old markbass rig (which was sold to fund my ampeg purchase) i would take the markbass.
^^^Your ears will tell you what is right for you. FYI, if I were shopping for a new rig right now, I would also have a serious audition with the Ampeg PF line. Good luck with your decision.
I haven't touched anything mark bass in a few years but i used to own an LMII and the traveler 102p cab. I currently own the GK MB210 combo (as a smaller light amp for when my Ampeg svt 7 pro and 410hlf is too big). The two heads are pretty different. The GK has a more aggressive sound with no real "flat" setting. It does the modern sound really well with a lot of top end sizzle and pretty big but clear sounding lows (I boost the mids and basically try to eq in a more old school sound). The tweeter can be either on or off. I keep it off, personally I think it is way too harsh. The markbass stuff has a much "flatter" sound or should I say un-colored. I think it gets a more authentic old school sound but in my opinion the markbass stuff sounds a little sterile. For me, my sound is ampeg. If you can check out the pf 500 and maybe the pf 210 cab you might like that. You should really check out both the amps you mention if you can. I have the GK but given the option to trade it for my old markbass rig (which was sold to fund my ampeg purchase) i would take the markbass.
I went to my Guitar Center in Toledo a few weeks ago to try out some higher powered combos that I could actually move around by myself. I tried a few models, but the one that really stood out was the GK MB210. The sound was very aggressive and I loved it. I thought it sounded much better than the mark bass stuff. It had plenty of lows. I actually had to dial back the lows. the tweeter sounded great but I had to dial down the treble so it wouldn't puncture my eardrums. I bought it last week. It did well on it's own at 350 watts, but you can only get so much out of two 10's. Yesterday I added the 115MBE to it and now its is a completely different animal. It can handle any gig without any problems and it's total weight is under 70 pounds. I am very happy with the GK combo. Way better than the markbass stuff in my opinion and it costs much less too! I don't buy anything on someones word, so I don't expect you to either. At least give the Mb210 a test drive.
