I definitely prefer 50w and 100w all tube guitar amps for bass. I’ve had actual bass amps (Peavey Alpha Bass, Hartke 2000…good amps) but I’ve found most modern bass amplifiers focus too much on low fundamentals at the cost of mids and low-mids, which is really where we humans can hear better anyway. But I can always get a GREAT tone from, say a Fender Showman, Bassman (50w or 100w), Marshall 1959 Plexi Super Lead, etc… Even a Peavey ValveKing makes a great bass amp (specifically clean channel) Kind of a poor man’s Showman. In fact, I’ve decided to start using a first generation ValveKing 100 head instead of hauling my ‘71 Dual Showman Reverb around.
I recently picked up a Bugera 1960 Infinium. Craigslist for $200. Since I’ve had Marshall 1959SLP heads in the past and used them expressly for bass, I wanted to see how the Bugera did. It’s been almost 17 years since I had a Marshall 1959SLP so I had to go off of memory, but I was very impressed on how good the Bugera sounds as a bass amp! It sounds good for guitar, but nothing my little Crate Vintage Club amps couldn’t do IMO. For electric bass the normal channel on the Bugera sounds very full and solid with LOTS of headroom. Upping the volume control and dialing back the master a tick allows for juuuuust a touch of “fudge”…not distortion per se, just some smooth warmth and character.
That being said, I purchased the Bugera with the idea of selling my ValveKing 100 head. In the end, I kept the ValveKing and sold the Bugera after just a few days, not due to any fault or issues with the Bugera, but I only needed one of them and the ValveKing was more usable overall as a bass amp for me. The ValveKing has a “Resonance” control that affects the damping factor on the lower frequencies, allowing the speaker to move a little more freely. For bass guitar it adds more “punch” compared to just upping the bass knob, and I really like this feature.
One thing that I both liked and disliked about the Bugera, which brought back memories of the Marshall 1959SLP, is that the Normal channel, while very full and punchy, has very little top end, even with the presence and treble maxed out. Great for lots of things, but you must use the Bright channel along with it to get any top end. And when you do, it adds almost too much top end, even if you dial back the treble and presence completely. It doesn’t take away the lows, but that bright circuit is BRIGHT!! So with the Bugera 1960 Infinium I could get R&B and Led Zeppelin on one end, or Yes on the other, but not much in between. A lot of guys would have kept both amps, but selling one of the 2 heads was the caveat to buying the Bugera to begin with.
I can’t say you would really go wrong with the Bugera, and your experience may vary. If all I had was the Bugera 1960 I’d be happy, but side by side with the ValveKing, I found the Peavey to be more versatile is all.
There’s also the matter of reliability. Peaveys are known for being pretty bullet proof, Bugeras not so much. Although it seems that the bugs have been worked out with the Infinium series amplifiers. The bright channel on mine made a rather noticeable high pitched hissing noise when the bright channel was turned up even the tiniest bit, although it was drowned out when played. I recall one of the two Marshall 1959SLPs I had doing something similar, so it may or may not be a universal issue.
If you’re interested in a Bugera 1960 Infinium and can find one for $300 or less you can’t go wrong. And you can easily get your money back if it’s not for you. Same goes for the Peavey ValveKing 100 head, and they can be found for as low as $200. Both sound great and are a good way to get that classic 100w all tube tone!