• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Mesa cab (or other cabs) model differences

Jan 6, 2022
1,152
1,406
25
Germany
I'm sure this has been discussed plenty of times, but I'm lazy, I like to get current information, and the search functions don't always work as expected.

Now that Mesa is making a grand return to Europe, I will hopefully soon be getting my TT-800. I have not yet ordered a cab specifically for that amp though, and I'm not sure if I should either.
I've noticed over the years that many manufacturers don't like to give specific details about their cabs, at least not to a point where you can easily compare response graphs or such. I understand that a response graph for a guitar/bass cab can be very misleading, since were not really looking for a flat response in such a situation anyways. But I do think that it would make comparisons easier, when you have a reference point.

My main question is, is there some place where someone has accurately, and reliably, measured all kinds of cabs (for me personally the Mesa subway line would be interesting), and compared them against one another. Maybe with sound samples, but especially with graphs and other info.


I came to this question, because I've been wondering how much difference you would get from let's say a Mesa subway 212, compared to a 112. The 212 obviously will have more output, but is that all there is?
Another example would be the Ampeg 210s, which from what I've read, are supposed to sound like a small 810. How accurate is that claim?

I know that almost all manufacturers will provide lengthy texts that aim to show the customer how incredibly amazingly awesome THEIR product is. But I haven't found anything real in depth yet. And when I read how Agedhorse talks about the design of the Mesa amps and cabs, I sometimes wonder why Mesa doesn't provide something that in depth on their website. A bit more about the acutal intent of the designs, and less about how the products are amazing and you should buy them.
 
Bass Gear Magazine often does in-depth reviews of cabs and I find them to be very detail oriented and objectively honest. While there is always some subjectivity in any review, IMO Tom Bowlus and the staff just call them the way they see them using the same yardstick for everyone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SJan3 and rodl2005
We do provide very detailed specs on out bass cabinets, (way) more detailed that most manufacturers in fact:

Subway 115: 1x15 Subway Bass | Mesa/Boogie (select features & specs tab)
Is there something going on with the Subway cabinet building? I ordered a 2x10 Subway cabinet in February from a local store (in San Rafael) and it still hasn't shown up. Am I just being impatient?
 
Another example would be the Ampeg 210s, which from what I've read, are supposed to sound like a small 810. How accurate is that claim?

Well, the classic Ampeg 8x10 is really four sealed 2x10s in a stack, so if the Ampeg 2x10 is a sealed cab using the same drivers and the same volume, it's going to sound the same, just not as loud (ignoring the diffractions from having four of them stacked on top of each other, that is).
 
Last edited:
Is there something going on with the Subway cabinet building? I ordered a 2x10 Subway cabinet in February from a local store (in San Rafael) and it still hasn't shown up. Am I just being impatient?
Not that I know of, I will check though.
 
Well, the classic Ampeg 8x10 is really four sealed 2x10s in a stack, so if the Ampeg 2x10 is a sealed cab using the same drivers and the same volume, it's going to sound the same, just not as loud.
And not as deep either.