I admittedly do more reading than posting here, but it dawned on me this morning that band member replacement (for personal or professional reasons) seems to be a recurring topic. And as I read other folks' experiences, I'm often inspired to think back through my own.
For whatever reason, I've been part of several different modular bands through the years. I know the musical communities I've lived and gigged in have had a big influence on that - places where demand for musicians outstripped supply. There would be considerable personnel interplay between local acts as many of us were involved with multiple projects simultaneously. A funk/soul/Motown group I used to play with kept four drummers on tap who knew the material, and we'd call in whichever one of them wasn't otherwise booked that night. Substitute horn players were also a norm in that outfit. The only stable core of players were the guitarist, the vocalist, and myself. The same thing occurred in an oldies/rock/blues band I was in. The core turned out to be the front man/sax player, a second horn player, and myself. Drummers rotated in an out, as did guitarists. I was part of that band for close to three years before I moved on, and it got to where I'd never know which combination of players would be present for a given gig. Not that I had any trouble with that - all the folks in the "rotation" were competent players, we were all friends, and no matter who showed up, we were going to have fun and get a great audience reaction. We eventually turned it into a running joke and introduced the rotating players as "featured guests," even though folks that knew that band understood it was just a happy-go-lucky, plug-and-play affair.
Those were just two among several examples. As I've read other threads regarding band member replacement, I've often thought about suggesting modularity. Anybody else have successful modular band experiences? I'm a proponent of the concept, but then again, maybe I've just been lucky to be involved with projects that thrived on that sort of interplay.
For whatever reason, I've been part of several different modular bands through the years. I know the musical communities I've lived and gigged in have had a big influence on that - places where demand for musicians outstripped supply. There would be considerable personnel interplay between local acts as many of us were involved with multiple projects simultaneously. A funk/soul/Motown group I used to play with kept four drummers on tap who knew the material, and we'd call in whichever one of them wasn't otherwise booked that night. Substitute horn players were also a norm in that outfit. The only stable core of players were the guitarist, the vocalist, and myself. The same thing occurred in an oldies/rock/blues band I was in. The core turned out to be the front man/sax player, a second horn player, and myself. Drummers rotated in an out, as did guitarists. I was part of that band for close to three years before I moved on, and it got to where I'd never know which combination of players would be present for a given gig. Not that I had any trouble with that - all the folks in the "rotation" were competent players, we were all friends, and no matter who showed up, we were going to have fun and get a great audience reaction. We eventually turned it into a running joke and introduced the rotating players as "featured guests," even though folks that knew that band understood it was just a happy-go-lucky, plug-and-play affair.
Those were just two among several examples. As I've read other threads regarding band member replacement, I've often thought about suggesting modularity. Anybody else have successful modular band experiences? I'm a proponent of the concept, but then again, maybe I've just been lucky to be involved with projects that thrived on that sort of interplay.