@Fretless Mainly: (a) the word "voicings" can I substitute that with finger pattern, which work up and down the fretboard, as determined by the key in which the song is played? (b) your pdf shows these patterns / voicings, however some of your diagrams do not show which one the root is. I am not familiar with this notation, and am assuming that the number means with which finger you should fret, and does the #1 finger position always start on the root note?
As I read fretless' diagrams the number inside the circle is finger and outside the circle is a notation of scale degree. root, third, sharp 5th, FLAT FLAT SEVENTH(!!) etc. Some are inversions(root is not the lowest note)
tWT is correct here. Many of the patterns are indeed inversions, so the root is not always the lowest note. In fact, you'll see that the root is completely omitted in one or two of my examples. While normally the root is critical to bass playing, when playing chords on bass, especially in the context of a strong, standard musical resolution, such as:
| Dmin7 | G7 | CMaj7 |
the ear doesn't necessarily need the root in the CMaj7. Sure, it doesn't hurt to have it, but you don't need it. The brain fills it in almost automatically.
There are two primary reasons why I voiced the chords as I did (and yes, BassBron, voicing just means how the notes are arranged relative to one another, which could be described as "finger pattern"):
1. If you play around a bit with these, you'll see that it isn't that easy to construct three-note voicings all within 3 frets and 3 adjacent strings. The voicings I present just fall out of what can be done within those limitations.
2. I like the sound of close-position voicings that leave space (i.e., they are missing at least one note of the root, 3rd, 5th, 7th structure) and I like it when chords move a short distance and are expressed in different inversions -
root position is root, 3rd, 5th, 7th
first inversion is 3rd, 5th, 7th, root
second inversion is 5th, 7th, root, 3rd
and so forth. By voicing with only three pitches, it leaves a bit of room for the ear to fill in. The result is musically correct without sounding "cookie cutter, " if you will.
Of course, this is all just a starting point. You could create new voicings using all four strings and possibly a four-fret spread, but there are limits...