• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Musician or Bass Player?

What do you think of yourself as?

  • Musician

    Votes: 72 17.9%
  • Bass Player

    Votes: 72 17.9%
  • Both

    Votes: 216 53.6%
  • Carrots

    Votes: 43 10.7%

  • Total voters
    403
How many of you think of yourselves as musicians, and how many think of yourselves as bass players? As I work on different things (mainly theory and comp) I find myself asking this question fairly frequently and now I want to know what my fellow TB'ers think about the issue. Do you see a difference? Do you rememember a moment in your playing career when you crossed a threshold between one and the other? How would you define the difference, if you think there is one?
 
One term is more specific than the other. All bass players are musicians but not all musicians are bass players. All chihuahuas are dogs but...and so on.

I've always felt the opposite. I've seen guys play bass who don't have a musical bone in their body. I've always aimed to use my bass in a way that I would call musical, but can't say that I've always succeeded. How would you define a musician?
 
I play bass, but I'll probably never be a musician. I don't have the ears for it.
I've read (right on here even) that any musician should be able to hear when an instrument is out of tune, and I can't.
I also can't tune by ear, even to a relative pitch.

I'm not ashamed to wear a t-shirt out in public with a bass headstock on it though:

b52b2b748dc0aef11305684d1d6e901b.jpg

I need to get a new one though, because right now both of my basses are 2+2 headstocks, and I prefer that.
 
If you play a musical instrument then you're a musician. It's a category.

Yes, the bar for calling someone a musician is very low. We are then free to add out own subjective descriptors ranging from piss-poor to virtuoso.

I consider myself a muscian whose weapon of choice happens to be bass, unless I'm playing something else (which usually puts me in the piss poor category). ;)
 
Well, that's the thing -the semantics of English allow different people to mean totally different things by "musician." For some, that implies a person with a deep vocation in music, whose identity is defined by their capacity to make music (a very high bar, by which few bass players are true musicians). For others, it just means anyone who picks up an instrument and plays a note (a very low bar, by which all bass players are a subset of the category "musician" by definition).

I think what the OP is really asking, though, is how we see the role of the bass in our musical lives - do we think of ourselves fundamentally making music and the choice of bass as an instrument to do it on is incidental, or do we have a special relationship with the bass guitar and that's the lens that we look at the rest of music through?

Myself, I'm somewhere in between. I used to play saxophone in school, took some rounds of piano lessons, took up mandolin for singing around a campfire, play some guitar in church and when writing songs, etc. So I guess that makes me a "musician" in that I don't exclusively play bass. But I dropped sax in 10th grade to focus on drama club and never really thought of myself as a "musician" in the vocation sense banging out campfire songs on mandolin. It was bass that really made music "home" for me, got me into bands and performing in front of audiences and all that.
 
If I consider myself either of those things, then I will lose the will and drive to push myself and use the energy to look down upon beginners driving them away from the instrument all together.

My vote is for broccoli.