• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

My $.02 on the Nickleback basher

Only in the sense that they are two hugely popular bands and that I don't particularly like either of them.

The Beatles defined, and continue to define, an era. Nickelback, not so much.

The Beatles have sold the most albums in history. Nickelback, not so much.

The Beatles have had hundreds, if not thousands, of cover bands converge specifically for them, and have inspired millions of people around the world to engage in musicianship. Nickelback...

You get the point. While I see your point, I don't think the Beatles are the best group to choose for your analogy.
 
Not really a fan of Nickelback but who cares. I would trade places with them in a heart beat and so would most of the haters. No they might not have sold as many albums as the Beatles but they have still sold a ton and toured to packed houses for a number of years now. Rough life. Of course someone will make a comment about playing music that has integrity but they will also probably have a day. And not necessarily at Burger King.
 
The Beatles defined, and continue to define, an era. Nickelback, not so much.

The Beatles have sold the most albums in history. Nickelback, not so much.

The Beatles have had hundreds, if not thousands, of cover bands converge specifically for them, and have inspired millions of people around the world to engage in musicianship. Nickelback...

You get the point. While I see your point, I don't think the Beatles are the best group to choose for your analogy.

Dude, I think once you reach a certain level of success people stop counting the album sales. No, not the best example, but YES you did get my point so it did work as an example.
 
The Beatles defined, and continue to define, an era. Nickelback, not so much.

The Beatles have sold the most albums in history. Nickelback, not so much.

The Beatles have had hundreds, if not thousands, of cover bands converge specifically for them, and have inspired millions of people around the world to engage in musicianship. Nickelback...

You get the point. While I see your point, I don't think the Beatles are the best group to choose for your analogy.

I'd still prefer to listen to Nickelback though, or chalk scraping a board...... or silence would be nice......
 
Dude all you haters know Nickelback lyrics. So jokes on you. I'm not a fan of them by any means, nor do I like The Beatles. But they do what GREAT musicians do, write songs that people like. They swallow their foolish pride, stick to the basics, simple chord structures and singable lyrics.
Great musicians?

...Really? :eyebrow:

I myself would be more inclined to call them great entertainers.
 
Dude all you haters know Nickelback lyrics. So jokes on you. I'm not a fan of them by any means, nor do I like The Beatles. But they do what GREAT musicians do, write songs that people like. They swallow their foolish pride, stick to the basics, simple chord structures and singable lyrics.
Nope, I don't know the lyrics. ("Hater" is such a silly, drama-queen term.) And you'll never convince me that that is what all, or even most, great musicians do. By that cockamamie standard, Nickelback's composed of great musicians, while Frank Zappa wasn't one.:p
 
I was never a fan of Nickelback, but their latest album did impress me. Myself, I look at the little things they do that add musicalness to the songs. Listen to the basslines sometimes. Nothing overly special, but he's doing what he's supposed to be doing for the music.

The overall sound I typically do not enjoy. "How You Remind Me" is a song I absolutely hate. But on their latest album, I enjoyed a few songs. There's "worse" bands.
 
Nope, I don't know the lyrics. ("Hater" is such a silly, drama-queen term.) And you'll never convince me that that is what all, or even most, great musicians do. By that cockamamie standard, Nickelback's composed of great musicians, while Frank Zappa wasn't one.:p

You are such a hater that you hate on the word hater:spit: I never said Zappa was not a great musician. And I would consider Zappa rockstar, even though he does not play conventional music.

And if you don't know one song title/lyric by Nickelback then you have been living under a rock.

Let me ask you this, is it not a talent in its self to play/write popular music, whether you like it our not? Hey man I listen to metal and jazz two less popular genres, but I'm not gonna say Nickelback sucks because I'm not a fan.
 
I was never a fan of Nickelback, but their latest album did impress me. Myself, I look at the little things they do that add musicalness to the songs. Listen to the basslines sometimes. Nothing overly special, but he's doing what he's supposed to be doing for the music.

The overall sound I typically do not enjoy. "How You Remind Me" is a song I absolutely hate. But on their latest album, I enjoyed a few songs. There's "worse" bands.

Not that he plays the most not or is a Jaco type player but I have liked the tones I have heard. Punchy and growling