TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
your not gonna get unity gain on your clean side with that tone stack(assuming thats a buffer) and personally i'd wire the switch differently.
Well my goal is to send my original tone to the loop and have tone control over the clean that is added into the blend. Does that make sense?
I got the idea from the new Fender Sub-lime Fuzz. It has the cross whatever in it. I guess this is just something i thought up from that.
I think If you could have a simple tone knob to change the character of the clean mix in the blend would be cool. It will force the clean mix to fill in a particular sonic space rather than my entire clean sound.
Oh and on the switch I wanted everything in the pedal to be bypassed. The way you mentioned would keep my tone section active wouldnt it?
So basically you want two loops within the pedal and a bypass on top of that. To start with you're going to have to buffer the the original signal then send one part to the effects loop(send/return) and the other to the tone control, each of these will then have to be buffered before going to the blend knob. So it's pretty similar to the paralooper except you want a tone control instead of just the low pass filter on the paralooper.
Here's the paralooper circuit, the bottom signal path is where you'd add your tone control.
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
Also worth taking a look at this thread and see how the paralooper with adjustable high and low pass filters works. Personally I find that more than enough as I don't want to change my clean tone from what it is.
http://www.talkbass.com/forum/showthread.php?t=422533&page=2
the switch would still be wired as said or can also be wired for a status led if you use a 3pdt switch.
drumandbass, I have no idea lol. Im not good at this stuff yet. I'm sure it can be done cause i have seen them before, but i dont know where to begin.
Haha, thanks!
I have no idea where to start as well.
Actually I could pass on the idea to a local pedal builder. But I'm concerned about a few things.
Whats the best way to split the signal to different loops without any tone loss. Buffered? or another way?
And when it gets back into the box with the volume control, would it stack over each other or be independent and goes straight to the output. I have no idea how to phrase these in a way the guy would understand. Or at least so he wont make it and it not working to what i expect.
Hawkbone, I found all this around the web for free. No kits sorry. Umm do you mean have two out puts after the blend or two outputs both with a blend?
Moosapotamus in the thread I linked to makes the paralooper for sale, it's his design too btw.
I was thinking it would be cool to have the option to recombine the signals to send to one amp or just leave them separate and send to two amps