• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Natural vs Tinted? Which finish do you gravitate toward?

Clear vs Color

  • Au Naturel

    Votes: 62 41.1%
  • Transparent Color

    Votes: 59 39.1%
  • Solid Color

    Votes: 30 19.9%

  • Total voters
    151
Mar 17, 2008
3,456
87
CT
I'm curious, what type of finish do you find you end up with on most of your basses: au naturel, solid color or see-through color?

I was thinking about my old basses and the majority of them were natural or a transparent color.
I think I've owned 13 instruments over the years and IIRC, there were 6 naturals (including all 3 that I own currently), 4 transparent colors and 3 solids.
 
I'd say that transparent colors can be cool if the wood grain is nice.

currently, of my basses and guitars, I have 5 "natural", one transparent (blue quilt), two solid color, and one sunburst (that would be both solid and transparent, eh?)
 
not surprisingly, my preferences run counter to the majority. I prefer solid color>opaque color>natural

In fact, I've never owned a "natural" wood bass and don't consider them for that reason. definitely not a fan of "coffee table top" basses either. just my .02 IMHO YMMV etc.
 
not surprisingly, my preferences run counter to the majority. I prefer solid color>opaque color>natural

In fact, I've never owned a "natural" wood bass and don't consider them for that reason. definitely not a fan of "coffee table top" basses either. just my .02 IMHO YMMV etc.

+1

As my sig notes, I'm a fan of flashy basses. Unusual colors, sparkly finishes. Most people would probably call me tacky. Someday I vow to own a surf green bass with a pearloid pickguard.
 
I'd say that transparent colors can be cool if the wood grain is nice.

currently, of my basses and guitars, I have 5 "natural", one transparent (blue quilt), two solid color, and one sunburst (that would be both solid and transparent, eh?)

Whoa, I noticed I omitted 1 bass from my inventory. I've actually had 4 opaques, not 3. I somehow managed to forget about the wildest finished bass I've ever owned-a "Firecrackle" Charvel that I owned around 1989-1991.


Gubna, IMHO, when I think burst of any sort, I think transparent first because you can normally see the grain in the surface of the body. You only lose the grain if and when the finish goes black. On a Cherry Sunburst, there's no black edge and you see the grain all the way 'round.

My tastes have definitely changed over the years. 2 of the first 3 basses I ever owned were solid colors (both black) and only 2 of the last 11 were opaque. (Cant really call the firecrackle one "solid").

As I get older, I've developed more of an affection for "coffee table" looking basses. I enjoy a really pleasing grain much more than a flashy finish.
Of course, I wouldn't mind a quilted maple top with a really deep, clear emerald green or sapphire blue finish
...mmmmmmmmmmmmm :)