TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Can you elaborate on this?those 08-09 road worns had something special in them that the newer ones don't. I am always keeping an eye out for one. Good find!!
it's simply a finish option. like natural, black, white, two tone sunburst etc
Oh they're awesome instruments, no doubt about it. Oteil played one with The Allman Brothers Band FCOLIn my experience, it's been more than a simple finish option. The three RW instruments I have all have an unmatched resonant tone.
They're also lighter weight.
I nearly bought a RW J for a similar amount years ago but I really didn't need another Jazz bass. As Pocket Dave said - it felt/played nice, sounded great and was light. They had Fender PV63 J pu's which they initially sold separately but were quickly bought up and then no longer available. PV74's which are also good can still be found for sale now & then.Mark Kendrick was given the assignment by Fender to head up the Road Worn production at the Fender Ensenada Mexico factory. I have a first-year production model. I purchased it at Wild West Guitars in Riverside, CA. I had their tech set it up for me. It's one of the best playing jazz basses I own. An incredible value at $900.00. I would highly recommend the J or P model.
When they first came out I didn't have an issue with the relic thing (if you've seen my P Bass of Doom). I just liked them for the lightweight and nice neck feel. I also liked the Classic 60s series in lacquer but not always as light as the RW. I do have a first-run Classic 60s Jazz.The Road Worn series was a very successful line for Fender - they sold years worth of them. Because of or regardless of the 'look', players bought them because they were great sounding and playing basses. I agree that the factory wear was stylized and not really convincing, but the concept was sorta genius in my opinion. As in, one played it w/o worrying about dinging or scratching it. As they had more of a satin finish, there was no need to polish it within an inch of its life. And, used ones would look the same as a new one. Fender de-emphasized the iconic "preciousness" of a vintage instrument, and focused making an affordable instrument (that sorta looked vintage) meant to be played. Some ($$$) FCS relic finishes look convincing, some not so much depending on who at Fender did it. In my opinion, Nash ($$) relic finishes are not convincing. Point being, relic-ing can either be well done.., or not.
I really wish I knew how, but they just feel and sound better. The ones I have played were all 8.5lbs or less and were extremely resonant. The neck was perfect and the action was effortlessly low with no buzz. I have played 2 from this era and they felt like leaps and bounds above the newer ones of the same model. Coincidence maybe? hard to say.Can you elaborate on this?
One thing is that the bodies are thinner than a standard P or J - more like a '60s vintage P or J were. Not sure what wood was used - possibly basswood which is a resonant tone wood and light. Being that it is generally softer & dents easier - again, on a 'road-worn' body such is right at home.I really wish I knew how, but they just feel and sound better. The ones I have played were all 8.5lbs or less and were extremely resonant. The neck was perfect and the action was effortlessly low with no buzz. I have played 2 from this era and they felt like leaps and bounds above the newer ones of the same model. Coincidence maybe? hard to say.
Those trucks are bad ass.I actually like it when cars or trucks are involved…
Very SteampunkThose trucks are bad ass.
I few years back, I made a coffee table out of PVC pipe and MDF:
View attachment 7168236View attachment 7168235