Yeah that would be a good choice as well.I like Rush, but I'd opt for something from The Band's catalog![]()
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Yeah that would be a good choice as well.I like Rush, but I'd opt for something from The Band's catalog![]()
I think I will leave the pickup cover on for a while at least. I like the way it looks.BTW there is a Ric group on TB
The Rickenbacker Club Part Twelve
And there is a lot of advice out there about changes and etc. for your Ric. I just got a new Old Stock 4003 MapleGlo about a month ago.
So far loving it, and don't see a need right now to change a thing on it. I am a Finger style player using floating thumb technique, so the Bridge Pup Cover is fine for me, and nothing I need to over come. In fact it seems to give a nice option.
My only work around is the High Gloss finish on the back of the neck. To me adds a little drag after a while playing. I get around that with the tried and true Jeff Beck baby powder method.
Enjoy Amigo.
Thanks . I've never had the chance to play one of the old ones so I can't really compare them either but they always have and still do look beautiful.Congrats! Very pretty bass!
Never having owned a "modern" Ric (post checkerboard) I don't know how they play or sound compared to pre '72, but they sure still look fantastic!
My 4003 Fireglo finally got here after a 9 month wait.
It is everything I hoped for.View attachment 3919882 View attachment 3919883 View attachment 3919884 View attachment 3919885
I haven't had a chance to try the Ric-O-Sound yet but I will very soon.Most pleasing to the lookers. Ric-O-Sound??
Beautiful, congrats!
Every time I see a Ric on here I want one. Then I play one and am not quite as enamored, but that doesn't change the fact that they are the most aesthetically pleasing basses ever.
Very nice! I had a Jet-glo some time back, But I didn't like the way it felt. So I got rid of it. I did enjoy playing it through 2 Amps though, using the Ric-O-Sound! Probably should've tried harder to like it.My 4003 Fireglo finally got here after a 9 month wait.
It is everything I hoped for.View attachment 3919882 View attachment 3919883 View attachment 3919884 View attachment 3919885
People seem to love them or hate them but almost everyone thinks they are beautiful.Beautiful, congrats!
Every time I see a Ric on here I want one. Then I play one and am not quite as enamored, but that doesn't change the fact that they are the most aesthetically pleasing basses ever.
Sometimes it just takes some time to get used to a new Bass and sometimes it never feels right.Very nice! I had a Jet-glo some time back, But I didn't like the way it felt. So I got rid of it. I did enjoy playing it through 2 Amps though, using the Ric-O-Sound! Probably should've tried harder to like it.View attachment 3920613
I find the bridge pick up cover makes a nice thumbrest, which works perfect for me since I always play behind that pick up anyway.BTW there is a Ric group on TB
The Rickenbacker Club Part Twelve
And there is a lot of advice out there about changes and etc. for your Ric. I just got a new Old Stock 4003 MapleGlo about a month ago.
So far loving it, and don't see a need right now to change a thing on it. I am a Finger style player using floating thumb technique, so the Bridge Pup Cover is fine for me, and nothing I need to over come. In fact it seems to give a nice option.
My only work around is the High Gloss finish on the back of the neck. To me adds a little drag after a while playing. I get around that with the tried and true Jeff Beck baby powder method.
Enjoy Amigo.
Beautiful! I love the fireglo on this one!My 4003 Fireglo finally got here after a 9 month wait.
It is everything I hoped for.View attachment 3919882 View attachment 3919883 View attachment 3919884 View attachment 3919885