• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

New Gibson sg, gutted

That degree of sloppy finishing and QC would not be out of place on a cheap Asian copy from the 1970's, in fact many Asian copies from back then, were streets better finished than that.

So what's that in the USA, a near two thousand dollar bass? Regardless of how it plays, no company selling guitars and basses at that sort of price point, should be shipping stuff that sloppily finished. If a cheap Chinese instrument looked like that, people would be making comments like what do you expect and you get what you pay for, etc.

I'd be sending it back and messaging Gibson to tell them how I feel.
 
I don't understand how Gibson still has customers buying new instruments. It's been nothing but QC complaints for years and years now plus questionable business practices and prick moves by the spokespeople.
I do, because this awesome example is my daily driver. Been gigging it regularly. Super QC, no issues at all that i could find.
DSCN3833.JPG
 
I've see quite a few new Gibson basses delivered with wavy/bumpy finish along the edge of the fingerboard latley. It's unacceptable buy yet there it is. The finish on my 2021 Affinity Squier is better than the finish on my 2021 Gibson Nonreverse Thunderbird.
 
Last edited:
I've see quite a few new Gibson basses delivered with wavy/bumpy finish along the edge of the fingerboard latley. It's unacceptable buy yet there it is. The finish on my 2021 Affinity Squier is better than the finish on my 2921 Gibson Nonreverse Thunderbird.
My Les Paul Doublecut has some wavy-bumpy finish over top of sanding marks on the edge of the fingerboard. I will probably strip the neck at some point anyway so I’m not too fussed about it.
From what I have seen, if you want a perfect finish, buy an Epiphone.
 
Not sure what to do, didn’t expect this level of poor Qc, it arrived today fresh out of the box

What I see in the pics is the aftermath of some rookie scraping stain and/or filler off the fretboard, post finish, because it wasn't removed pre-finish. And then the instrument was finished again, without sanding to level it. This is very badly done rework at the factory in an attempt to salvage an instrument (it was easily salvageable if this had been done properly).

There is zero excuse for it going out the door like that and OP should return that instrument immediately if possible. I know post-COVID they have new finishing guys, everyone does. And training takes time and money. But still, zero excuse for this.
 
If you're talking about how the fingerboard doesn't line up with the neck (and thus is filled with a boatload of clearcoat), I can't say I'm surprised.

I like Gibson and own a few but honestly, the fingerboard doesn't line up with the neck on any of them. It's almost as if they all shrink in storage or something. I've had some success by oiling the fingerboard (if raw wood) way more than I should, but it doesn't fix the issue by any stretch. And you've got clearcoat on the neck, so that isn't going to help. Not that you should need to repair it anyways.

I don't know what it is with Gibson. I hate to say it, but this fingerboard issue does not surprise me.
 
'a cheap Asian copy' is what I've finally settled on as my 3 lifetime basses, #3 is a great not-Fender P eclipsed by the other two recent retro models by the superior Epiphone. it's true, ''if you want a perfect finish, buy an Epiphone'' knowing the sound, feel, and playabilities match their mirror perfect finishes.
clearly, Gibson are so arrogant they are their own worst enemies, yet so many can't resist buying.