• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

opinions on natural finished basses (additional question)

Dec 10, 2020
1,029
1,236
well, read the title. tell me! i personally love natural finish basses. they look raw and awesome, and what’s more raw of a sound than a low boomy punch to the gut. but my question i really want to ask is what, in your opinion, is the best wood to use for a natural finish. looks alone. or at least mostly. i don’t want to hear about “the tone man!!!!” for the most part, i want to hear about the pretty look of those chopped down trees. but if you want to talk about tone that’s okay too :thumbsup: like seriously i don’t want to gate-keep over here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dbsfgyd1
My favorite is maple, but somehow I always end up with ash bodies on my "naturals"....

L

msrh1sqa5aoubmsvtnio.jpg
 
5 of my 6 bass guitars are natural or burst; none of them are fancy figured woods. Just your normal ash, etc. I kind of like the look of those coffee table basses with a top layer of exotic wood, but I couldn't see paying extra for that.
 
I owned a natural finish Fender American Pro Jazz that I simply drooled over. However, I found it uncomfortable to play and ended up selling it. Since then I've owned a bunch of other basses that didn't have a natural finish but they always caught my eye. What ended up catching BOTH of my eyes was this Serek Sacramento that has a maple body and neck. I love it!

What's odd is that I am not a fan of non matching natural woods. EX: a natural ash body with a rosewood neck. I feel like I see that in Stingrays quite a bit and I immediately move past them with a hearty "nooope".
image.jpeg
 
I owned a natural finish Fender American Pro Jazz that I simply drooled over. However, I found it uncomfortable to play and ended up selling it. Since then I've owned a bunch of other basses that didn't have a natural finish but they always caught my eye. What ended up catching BOTH of my eyes was this Serek Sacramento that has a maple body and neck. I love it!

What's odd is that I am not a fan of non matching natural woods. EX: a natural ash body with a rosewood neck. I feel like I see that in Stingrays quite a bit and I immediately move past them with a hearty "nooope".View attachment 4097671
totally! my first ever real bass i got that will arrive here in a month or two is a walnut body with a maple neck and fretboard. something is a little off-putting about using a light wood, say ash, next to just a sliiiiightly different color light wood, maple. it’s just enough to be like “man i wish they were the same color”. plus i think dark finish things look deeper and richer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HOTCARL
you may be wondering “walnut body with one piece maple neck? how does that have to do with what i said?”, and it’s just that it’s simplicity. two woods on the whole bass, they look different, simple colors, serve different but ordinary purposes, and both beautiful woods.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HOTCARL