• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Bass Piazzolla notation question

This marking, with the up-slash, shows up in Piazzolla's "Fuga y Misterio" and I am unsure how to interpret it. (My apologies if this has already been answered but I couldn't find in on the forums.)
Screenshot 2026-07-12 at 16.39.04.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Winoman
It appears to be an ARCO related marking, as seen in the performance below (this is approx. where the OP's sheet music excerpt begins.)
It is NOT a Bartok Pizz indication, based on the YT performance below.

I hope some of the Orchestral Heavyweights will chime in and clarify&confirm.
Thx.
 
  • Like
Reactions: foilracer
I’m glad to see that there are so many authorities on Bartok here on TB.
I looked at what seems to be original manuscripts of a string quartet. There are a few examples of circles above certain notes. I don’t see slanting lines, but maybe other’s eyesight is better than mine. Obviously, arrangers and publishers are taking ‘liberties’ with the printed music and notation.
Regarding the OP’s question, this appears at this point to be a dead end regarding authentic notation.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7909.png
    IMG_7909.png
    2.9 MB · Views: 14
  • IMG_7910.png
    IMG_7910.png
    2.8 MB · Views: 12
  • IMG_7911.png
    IMG_7911.png
    2.9 MB · Views: 13
  • IMG_7912.png
    IMG_7912.png
    2.7 MB · Views: 11
  • IMG_7913.png
    IMG_7913.png
    2.1 MB · Views: 11
  • IMG_7914.png
    IMG_7914.png
    2.4 MB · Views: 10
  • Like
Reactions: JBarz
I’m glad to see that there are so many authorities on Bartok here on TB.
I looked at what seems to be original manuscripts of a string quartet. There are a few examples of circles above certain notes. I don’t see slanting lines, but maybe other’s eyesight is better than mine. Obviously, arrangers and publishers are taking ‘liberties’ with the printed music and notation.
Regarding the OP’s question, this appears at this point to be a dead end regarding authentic notation.
Apologies if the shortness of my response was frustrating, but the question was never about the authenticity of the arrangement or the original intentions of Piazzola. The marking in the original post is a glissando marking, and the Bartok pizz marking is established and widespread and also not present.
 
Apologies if the shortness of my response was frustrating, but the question was never about the authenticity of the arrangement or the original intentions of Piazzola. The marking in the original post is a glissando marking, and the Bartok pizz marking is established and widespread and also not present.
No apologies necessary. The two composers, Piazzola and Bartok were of the people, ie, composed melodies and music that reflected the ‘folk’ nature of their cultures. It difficult to notate the sound. Chopin is another great example.
I think we’re all good. Hopefully, the OP finds the answer with his music director.
 
  • Like
Reactions: slappahdabass
I may not be a Bartok expert, but I am a Bartok pizzicato expert.

Here’s how Bartok’s publisher notated the effect in his 4th string quartet (published 1929):

68866633-59C2-4118-9723-300C3A575691.jpeg


That’s been the standard notation for a snap pizzicato ever since.

As for OP’s question: it’s certainly a quick glissando into the note. Rather poorly engraved, I have to say.
 
I may not be a Bartok expert, but I am a Bartok pizzicato expert.

Here’s how Bartok’s publisher notated the effect in his 4th string quartet (published 1929):

View attachment 7536280

That’s been the standard notation for a snap pizzicato ever since.

As for OP’s question: it’s certainly a quick glissando into the note. Rather poorly engraved, I have to say.
Thank-you. That looks like the string quartet manuscript. 👍👍