• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

pine-wood bass body is go.

Some years ago I had a Warwick Streamer Standard that was made from something they call Carolena wood, which is actually a pine. Aside from being terribly easy to ding, this particular bass had virtually no real bottom end, even when eq'd through the amp. It was my impression that the wood just absorbed low frequencies in a way that hard woods do not. It would not be my first choice for a bass body.
 
If I am not mistaken, I read in BP years ago about the Parker Fly bass using pine. At the very least, they were researching it, not sure it it was a prototype. They were going to use pine in conjunction with a hard outer finish to produce a super-lightweight instrument.
 
I have a "Less Paul" bass ("Less" meaning "cheap" or less money) that is in the planning stages.

It's going to be a walnut neck thru using walnut from a 100 yr old pipe organ with pine body wings. The pine will be a "cowboy wood" top glued up to 2x4's with walnut stringers between the pine pieces.

Why?.... why the hell not?