Why does Musicman continue to make their 5 string Stingray necks too narrow for their bridge spacing?
Am I the only one that this bothers?
16 Years ago I purchased a new Musicman Stingray 5 (this one):
After it arrived, though I love the sound, I immediately struggled with the G sting riding so close to the edge of the fingerboard. It literally hoovered above the area on the end of the fret (where it was filed). If I didn't push up a little when I played I would eventually pull the string over the edge of the fingerboard.
I traded the bass after 2 weeks due to this reason.
Obviously not everyone struggles with this because there are so many players out there that own and play the Musicman SR 5's. Maybe I have bad technique in that area but I don't have this issue with any other basses.
This design issue on the MM 5 has kept me from owning a MM Stingray 5.
It could easily be solved by either slightly widening the neck at the body or at least providing a bridge design that allows tweaking the string spacing.
I recently stopped by a local music store and played one of the new Sterling by Musicman SUB Ray 5's and they solved this problem by reducing the string spacing to 16.5 mm at the bridge. This allows plenty of room from the edge of the fingerboard to the G string. I liked it so much that I ordered a Lake Blue Metallic Ray 5 from MF and love it. Here's a pic:
I measured the neck and it appears to be the exact measurements at the nut and body as the MM SR5. But with the narrower string spacing the strings are better centered on the neck. Oddly the narrower spacing on the Ray 5 doesn't bother me. It actually feels good. But I'm sure some players wouldn't like it.
I'd love to own a US MM SR 5 but I guess as long as this issue exists I'll never purchase another one (although I really have GAS for a US MM SR 4 HH model).
Am I the only one that this bothers?
16 Years ago I purchased a new Musicman Stingray 5 (this one):
After it arrived, though I love the sound, I immediately struggled with the G sting riding so close to the edge of the fingerboard. It literally hoovered above the area on the end of the fret (where it was filed). If I didn't push up a little when I played I would eventually pull the string over the edge of the fingerboard.
I traded the bass after 2 weeks due to this reason.
Obviously not everyone struggles with this because there are so many players out there that own and play the Musicman SR 5's. Maybe I have bad technique in that area but I don't have this issue with any other basses.
This design issue on the MM 5 has kept me from owning a MM Stingray 5.
It could easily be solved by either slightly widening the neck at the body or at least providing a bridge design that allows tweaking the string spacing.
I recently stopped by a local music store and played one of the new Sterling by Musicman SUB Ray 5's and they solved this problem by reducing the string spacing to 16.5 mm at the bridge. This allows plenty of room from the edge of the fingerboard to the G string. I liked it so much that I ordered a Lake Blue Metallic Ray 5 from MF and love it. Here's a pic:
I measured the neck and it appears to be the exact measurements at the nut and body as the MM SR5. But with the narrower string spacing the strings are better centered on the neck. Oddly the narrower spacing on the Ray 5 doesn't bother me. It actually feels good. But I'm sure some players wouldn't like it.
I'd love to own a US MM SR 5 but I guess as long as this issue exists I'll never purchase another one (although I really have GAS for a US MM SR 4 HH model).
Last edited: