The chart specifically says “Jazz” chord progressions. ii/V/I. Not common in Jazz without the 7. I approach a seventh chord differently than a triad. Especially when soloing.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
True, not common in jazz without the 7. But it seems clear that that part of the chart is attempting to talk about progressions at their most basic functional level--ie, the triadic. Which I'd say is legit, if, well, basic. (Bass-ic?) And soloing is probably a bit beyond where this chart is at anyway.The chart specifically says “Jazz” chord progressions. ii/V/I. Not common in Jazz without the 7. I approach a seventh chord differently than a triad. Especially when soloing.
Thanks, I'm more looking at what's actually wrong. Might not be your preference, but tab isn't wrong.The fact that they're using tabs and "formulas" is so wrong. They should show the notes and not the finger positions. I'd burn it.
Thanks for the bonus, that's the exact sort of keen eyed help I was hoping for here1. Not wrong. Assume most read treble clef seems like a pretty standard assumption.
2. Yeah, it's wrong.
3. I don't think it's wrong, but honestly, don't care.
Bonus: in the chord name/formula section, Dom 7 Sus 4 shows the wrong formula.
You don't need to burn it in a sacred ritual but I wouldn't have bought it either.
Other problem is, this chart isn't actually teaching you how to read music.Thanks, I'm more looking at what's actually wrong. Might not be your preference, but tab isn't wrong.
No idea what this means. Sounds cool though . It's honestly just a reference for scales and a few other bits so it's in front of me, which I think it pretty much does (apart from the unquestionably wrong bits, not the bits that some folk disagree with on some deeper level that I'm clearly not at yet). It's not intended as a teaching tool as such for me, just a reference.To stop staring at the tall cylindrical grayish brown things in front of us for a moment, stepping back so that we can see the forest; what is the actual function of this thing? If it was a poster of a Roger Dean illustration, would we really be discussing the ability or inability of a vessel with sails to operate in the vacuum of space?
Yes you're absolutely right. But that would only be a problem if I had bought it to enable me to read music. I didn't, so it's not!Other problem is, this chart isn't actually teaching you how to read music.
I mean, it's a poster. Just a poster. Definitely not a teaching tool, if it's a reference, it's a bad one. It's just something to hang on the wall as some token to define the space it's displayed in as some kind of music person's space.No idea what this means. Sounds cool though . It's honestly just a reference for scales and a few other bits so it's in front of me, which I think it pretty much does (apart from the unquestionably wrong bits, not the bits that some folk disagree with on some deeper level that I'm clearly not at yet). It's not intended as a teaching tool as such for me, just a reference.
Will check that out. Thanks.Some of the Jamey Aebersold books have a few pages at the beginning that make for useful cheat sheets. His Maiden Voyage (Vol. 52, I think) has a bunch of chord and scale info that covers this poster and more.
When you go to jazzbooks.com (Jamey Aebersold’s website) scroll to the bottom and check out the Free Jazz section. The Jazz Handbook is one of the most valuable references I own and I keep the pdf of it on all my iPads.Will check that out. Thanks.
CheersWhen you go to jazzbooks.com (Jamey Aebersold’s website) scroll to the bottom and check out the Free Jazz section. The Jazz Handbook is one of the most valuable references I own and I keep the pdf of it on all my iPads.