I did not know that. If only there was some kind of readily available reference in which I could find such excellent and useful information...
Hmm. I wonder . . . .
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I did not know that. If only there was some kind of readily available reference in which I could find such excellent and useful information...
I recently purchased a 4003S and really like it. I had been on the lookout for a used 4004L because I had owned 2 other RICs – a 1979 4001 and more recently a Monty Brown 4003 – can’t deal with the hard edge and the binding, so I was after the 4004L – until I started seeing the 4003S on ebay – I had seen this bass at NAMM, but soon forgot about it. You can get it for less money than the 4004. I found a nice Mapleglo, which are harder to find right now – I’m seeing a lot of the other colors online. I dig the look of the S – no binding, dot inlays. I swapped out the bridge for the aluminum Hipshot, dumped the stock knobs for P bass style chrome knobs, ditched the pup cover and installed the black “treble bezel” with thumb rest and it’s good to go!
Does anybody know when RIC changed the body shape of the 4001 or maybe it wasn’t until the 4003. The old 4001 has thicker horns. It looks like they just took the slimmer shape of the 4004 and started making all of them that shape, but not sure what year this happened.
Hey bwoodman, could you post some pics of your modified S?
Hey bwoodman, could you post some pics of your modified S?
Are you thinking about picking up a 4003S?
Why the "may be"? Just do it.![]()
You are correct; the HB-1 pickups are hotter than hi-gain pickups, and to many people the 4004 is more comfortable as they do not have binding. But neither is better then the other, just different. The best approach would be for you to buy a 4004 (Laredo or Cheyenne depending on your preferences, they do sound a bit different from one another) and make you choice based on your own real world experience comparing the two. Do play around with your amp's controls such as the EQ; do not just set the amp up for what you are used to using with the 4003 as that may not produce the best from a 4004 given they do sound a bit different, again, not better, just different (a bit).
Hope this helps.![]()
John Hall told me that he made the No. 1 4004C Cheyenne (back in 1992) a lefty and gave it to PM (through PM's company agents). I've never seen photos of him with it, though.
[/QUOTE]I posted them on another thread - not sure which one - here's a couple:
![]()
![]()
that is nice !! I'd love it even more with a black pg..I posted them on another thread - not sure which one - here's a couple:
![]()
![]()
Is anything else known about the No. 1 given to Paul?
To keep the chrome vibe going - the black plastic knobs were not working for me...Like the bridge, but why change to those knobs? Aesthetics?
Ah, I see. I like the stock knobs, since they have position indicators.To keep the chrome vibe going - the black plastic knobs were not working for me...
Ah, I see. I like the stock knobs, since they have position indicators.
So, in terms of price the 4004's are more expensive or cheaper than the 4003's?
Deciding on a 4004 is pretty black & white (Jetglo & Snowglo in this case!)
View attachment 827638
Photograph Copyright © Jeffrey P. Scott 2015 All rights reserved.
Jeff, I'll get back to you by Tuesday I hope:-O