• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Bass Romberg bevel/ gut strings

Getting ready to replace the fingerboard on a 1965 Kay. I have a symmetrical fingerboard available but I may want to put guts on it one day since it seems as if I haven't lived a full life (according to some posts in the string forum) if I haven't owned a bass with gut strings. Frankly, I never owned or played guts, but I have heard the sound and it is intoxicating. Is it mandatory to have a Romberg bevel? My understanding is that the sole reason for the bevel was the large diameter of the E string.
 
Very few people actually use and like a gut E string, most use something like spiro EA mixed with gut DG; my personal choice for my old Kay. Smoothing out the romberg bevel usually makes for a much more modern feeling fingerboard. Your old Kay will feel a whole lot better if you also either replace the fingerboard with a much thicker one or use an ebony shim to beef up the original, and add some carbon fiber in the skinny neck. I just rebuilt three of them in the last couple of weeks like this.

Anytime you pass through Asheville, stop by for a visit and you can check out how it will feel before you make a commitment; this is one of the most common requests I get and I always have a couple in the shop strung up....

DSCN7509.JPG
 
Last edited:
Very few people actually use and like a gut E string, most use something like spiro EA mixed with gut DG; my personal choice for my old Kay. Smoothing out the romberg bevel usually makes for a much smoother, more modern feeling fingerboard. Your old Kay will feel a whole lot better if you also either replace the fingerboard with a much thicker one or use an ebony shim to beef up the original, and add some carbon fiber in the skinny neck. I just rebuilt three of them in the last couple of weeks like this.

Anytime you pass through Asheville, stop by for a visit and you can check out how it will feel before you make a commitment; this is one of the most common requests I get and I always have a couple in the shop strung up....
Thanks James, I had hoped you would have chimed in. Thanks for the string recommendation. I'm kind of on the fence about the current fingerboard. It is rosewood and not much meat left. But- it's king of cool looking. It has a knot it it that gives a unique appearance but I imagine would be difficult to smooth out. Already ordered the carbon fiber inserts in the size that you recommended in another thread. If I do decide to keep it, it would need a shim. I've attached a pic to get your thoughts.
Thanks for the invite to your shop. One of these days I plan on taking a detour on my way to see my son and grandkids in Raleigh. I'll have the sunken belly of my '39 Kay in tow for insertion into the world's only Kay Bass vacuum press!:thumbsup:
65 Kay.JPG
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raymond Kallas
This variegation in the wood is why the company typically ebonized the fingerboards on the cheaper models.

I just have to put in a plug here for documenting your Kay, which helps fill out our research database and can give you a little more assurance in case of loss. PM me if you're interested.
I know they ebonized the cheaper maple, but this is rosewood. I just figured it was at the bottom of the bin. I do plan on sending you #s and descriptions of the '65 and '39.
 
I have a Romberg bevel on my Strunal 5/35.

When I had it strung with low tension Innovation Super Silvers I actually kinda liked the bevel with a big ol floppy E string.

I have Spirocore Weichs on now and it doesn’t bother me one way or another. Certainly something I don’t feel needs to be corrected for its own sake. But the general take away seems to be its pretty old skool (but I’m OK with old skool...)

Just my 2 cents...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raymond Kallas