I've beat the crap out of my Rumble, accidentally of course, ...
Classic!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I've beat the crap out of my Rumble, accidentally of course, ...
Well said. My next amp is almost certainly going to be a Rumble bass amp, unless I luck up on a better used amp cheap. I don't particularly care about weight, but the combination of sound quality and cost, built with all the durability I'll ever need, is irresistible.We often forget that “price point” is a feature as well. The rumble more than accels within its class. And a better amp is worthless to a player that can’t afford it.
If you're gonna check it out at a music store, you won't need a lot of time to find a great tone out of the Rumble! I used my 38 year old Pbass to try it, but once I got home, it sounded perfect with my 6 other basses. And you have a ton of options as well! I don't think you'll be disappointed at all in the Rumble. CheersWell said. My next amp is almost certainly going to be a Rumble bass amp, unless I luck up on a better used amp cheap. I don't particularly care about weight, but the combination of sound quality and cost, built with all the durability I'll ever need, is irresistible.
We often forget that “price point” is a feature as well. The rumble more than accels within its class. And a better amp is worthless to a player that can’t afford it.
My commission on Hartke amps was about double what I made on Fender (dollar for dollar). I hated sales and only spent 3 months there before transferring to the warehouse.Dang it, Texican! You keep making me want to buy a Rumble 500! What am I going to do with all these bass heads? I already wanted one of Andy's creations. And now, this. Gees, Louise.
Anyway, I suspect the Rumble excels within its class as you pointed out because Fender doesn't pull as high a margin on it as some of their competitors selling at similar price points. If I'm right, you would then get more bang for your buck with the Fender, and Fender would be making up for the lower margin on volume. This design philosophy works out better for the musician purchasing the bass head. Not as much profit per unit for the retail outlet, though.
I spent several years managing retail stereo / home entertainment outlets back when Pacific Stereo was all the rage in California. The manufacturer's listed price for a piece of electronic equipment has little to do with the actual cost of the unit to the retail store. The difference is what we call "margin". A commissioned salesperson will in most cases have a strong inclination to push the products with the highest margin because they make the biggest commissions on selling those items. Sometimes, as an extra incentive, manufacturers or retail outlets will offer commissioned salespeople a cash payout immediately after they sell certain high profit margin items. We used to call these cash pay outs a "spiff".
I've heard salespeople who I happen to know work on a commission basis talk down the Fender Rumble line, and I believe lower margins may possibly be the reason. If so, then there would be other products at the same price point that would make such a sales person a higher commission per sold unit, and in some cases, certain sales people will hawk those items. So depending on what you buy, you might be spending a higher percentage of what you pay to the sales person and retail outlet, than others. I think there's a reason Fender has done so well with their Rumble line. Same with Mesa.