Firing a harp player takes precedence over firing a drummer.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Lol! Harped in the Back!! That’s great!Start your own blues band. Write a few simple songs.
"Sacked again"
"No subbing"
"Harped in the back"
Most of us a clever enough to have pre-empted harp playing firing by not hiring one in the first place.Firing a harp player takes precedence over firing a drummer.
Harped in the Back!
I always though harp players just kind of "showed up" after a few beers.Most of us a clever enough to have pre-empted harp playing firing by not hiring one in the first place.
You know the old saying 'fool me once shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me'? Well, it happened to me! Was in a blues band with a particular (wannabe) singer/harp player, as well as some other members. Come to find out that there was a conspiracy behind my back and was outed. OK, that's fine; I didn't particularly like them anyway. Fast forward, and I find myself in a different blues band; different personnel, but same singer/harp player. We actually played a few gigs and, despite having to replace the guitarist due to illness, were sounding pretty good.
OK. I had a gig lined up; an outdoor private party, that I had played last year, and was invited back for this year. Now, the new guitarist has health problems as well. 10 days before this date (which I had lined up this new blues band to play), this guy cancels a critical rehearsal because he was on a heart monitor and had to be in the hospital. I contact this harp player and we discuss the likelihood of this happening too close to this gig to find a replacement. We decide to cancel the gig.
Here is where it gets interesting! My understanding is that when a band member can't make a gig you find a fill in, if possible. You do not, under any circumstances, not play the gig! This harp player (ne- band leader) apparently doesn't share that opinion. So, I cover the gig with another band I play with, do the gig, all's well that ends well, right?
Apparently not, because I happened to mention this to this guy, the next thing I know, he has 'secret' discussions behind my back, and I am informed that they no longer need my services. Fool me twice - shame on me!
Wouldn't matter much to me, but they are now without a bassist and have a gig this Saturday that they have to probably cancel. Not to mention a few others already on the books that I would have liked to play because they are in nice venues!
Well, that's my story, sorry to bore you, but I feel better sharing with my brother and sister bass players!
I have a friend that has the same problem, only with wives...
The first line under Harp Player in the Gigging Bassists Handbook:I always though harp players just kind of "showed up" after a few beers.
LmaoThe first line under Harp Player in the Gigging Bassists Handbook:
Do not make eye contact with unknown Harp Player.
The second line under Harp Player in the Gigging Bassists Handbook:The first line under Harp Player in the Gigging Bassists Handbook:
Do not make eye contact with unknown Harp Player.
Well, there's your problem right there.harp player as band leader =![]()
A very wise ex-bandmate once told me "that's the nature of bands."
This- the only way I'd accept this if the dude from Blues Traveler showed up!harp player as band leader =![]()
I have a line that kinda applies.You know the old saying 'fool me once shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me'? Well, it happened to me! Was in a blues band with a particular (wannabe) singer/harp player, as well as some other members. Come to find out that there was a conspiracy behind my back and was outed. OK, that's fine; I didn't particularly like them anyway. Fast forward, and I find myself in a different blues band; different personnel, but same singer/harp player. We actually played a few gigs and, despite having to replace the guitarist due to illness, were sounding pretty good.
OK. I had a gig lined up; an outdoor private party, that I had played last year, and was invited back for this year. Now, the new guitarist has health problems as well. 10 days before this date (which I had lined up this new blues band to play), this guy cancels a critical rehearsal because he was on a heart monitor and had to be in the hospital. I contact this harp player and we discuss the likelihood of this happening too close to this gig to find a replacement. We decide to cancel the gig.
Here is where it gets interesting! My understanding is that when a band member can't make a gig you find a fill in, if possible. You do not, under any circumstances, not play the gig! This harp player (ne- band leader) apparently doesn't share that opinion. So, I cover the gig with another band I play with, do the gig, all's well that ends well, right?
Apparently not, because I happened to mention this to this guy, the next thing I know, he has 'secret' discussions behind my back, and I am informed that they no longer need my services. Fool me twice - shame on me!
Wouldn't matter much to me, but they are now without a bassist and have a gig this Saturday that they have to probably cancel. Not to mention a few others already on the books that I would have liked to play because they are in nice venues!
Well, that's my story, sorry to bore you, but I feel better sharing with my brother and sister bass players!