• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Sanox Logabass Designed by Leduc

Oct 18, 2016
3,557
7,410
Hi gang!
Anyone have or have had one of these early 90s headless curiosities?
What did you think about the tone and playability?
And what's the point of the extra five or so frets--the main individuating feature--being on the lower strings and not the higher ones? It's almost like a reverse Kubicki gimmick, only all those extra notes are easily accessible elsewhere on the fingerboard.
 
This may help anyone who wonders what we were talking about...

u0wjw7vlsmbzbdvtwkzx.jpg
 
Now that I see a picture I’d agree with @India_Sierra. It looks like the whole body tapers off on the treble side so it seems to be a visual and/or access for popping the strings thing.

Cool bass by the way. When were they produced and is that a proprietary bridge?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vinny_G
What an odd design choice. The builder must really like how that looks because it seems like a lot of effort to do that just for the sake of keeping frets people likely won’t use being that they’re on the bass side of the fretboard.
 
What an odd design choice. The builder must really like how that looks because it seems like a lot of effort to do that just for the sake of keeping frets people likely won’t use being that they’re on the bass side of the fretboard.
From what I understand, French luthier Christophe Leduc designed this bass for Sanox to build; his name is on the fine print under the logo. Could it really just be aesthetic? There is less on this bass online than just about any bass I've pseudo-researched.
 
These frets have not been added, it's the ones below that have been removed. I'm pretty sure this cutout in the fingerboard is there to make the slap technique easier. ;)

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

Translation:

"How to estimate the price of a Sanox Logabass?

I designed the Logabass around 1980 for the Japanese brand Sanox. One of the requirements was the use of Bartolini components. In France, they were distributed by Bass Center in Paris. I think I remember that the prices were around 12.000 Francs, which is now a little less than 2000 Euros. Of course, I enjoy working on these instruments, but not having manufactured or checked them, they cannot benefit from the Leduc instrument warranty. Currently for an instrument in good condition, a discount of around 30% on the new price seems reasonable to me.

Here is the flyer of the time, staring Bob Ferrari, Beaver Felton and Jon Maye!"
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mikewalker
These frets have not been added, it's the ones below that have been removed. I'm pretty sure this cutout in the fingerboard is there to make the slap technique easier. ;)

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

Translation:

"How to estimate the price of a Sanox Logabass?

I designed the Logabass around 1980 for the Japanese brand Sanox. One of the requirements was the use of Bartolini components. In France, they were distributed by Bass Center in Paris. I think I remember that the prices were around 12.000 Francs, which is now a little less than 2000 Euros. Of course, I enjoy working on these instruments, but not having manufactured or checked them, they cannot benefit from the Leduc instrument warranty. Currently for an instrument in good condition, a discount of around 30% on the new price seems reasonable to me.

Here is the flyer of the time, staring Bob Ferrari, Beaver Felton and Jon Maye!"
Thanks for posting!
The specs say it's a neck-thru, but it sure looks like a set neck to me.
I can't find any info on the scale ... is it just 35" despite all the frets?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vinny_G
What an odd design choice. The builder must really like how that looks because it seems like a lot of effort to do that just for the sake of keeping frets people likely won’t use being that they’re on the bass side of the fretboard.

I agree that they are of little use on this bass. Not only to go to the effort of cutting the slots before pressing, cutting and crowning the frets, but to find the longer pieces of wood needed to put these extra frets in. The fingerboards on these always looked like high quality pieces too, supposedly ebony but some look like highly figured rosewood or dark morado. I do now that Christophe Leduc was an early adopter of making very long fretless fingerboards. I've seen some of his basses, near enough 30 years old now I'd wager, with 36 position fretless boards. So for him, having a fingerboard that extends all the way to the neck pickup seems to be an appealing idea.
 
I love the hybrid bridge / tuner design...smacks of Kubicki although it appears to accept the ball-end rather than the tapered (tuner) end. Just a clarification: Kubickis were strung backwards with the the ball-end at the headstock. In any case, the Logabass is just 8 shades of cool and one bass I'd like to see re-introduced.

Riis