• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Slotted Headstocks?

I only have a picture of this Utria. Note that the headstock is closed in the back, so string changes are that more fiddly.

2942125utria.jpg
 
Stambaugh, but I don't know anything more about it...
View attachment 3592238

Anyone got any others? :D

Stambaugh has done it a few times. I think he didn't like doing it and no longer offers it.

I have an acoustic with a slotted headstock. Slight pain to restring. I generally don't order that on steel strings. The acoustic I own was already built with that. No pics since Photobucket is being a punk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beej
Ampeg’s “scroll” basses qualify for slotted I’d think.

View attachment 3592613

IIRC Eastwood did one of their knockoffs on these too.

I don't really consider the Ampeg Scroll Basses to be "slotted" style headstocks. They are Scroll style, with full flat-sided pegboxes and curled heads. To me, a slotted headstock is basically a flat or tilted headstock, with slots or an opening cut in the middle, and the tuners mounted on the edges, keys down.

The Eastwood sorta-copy has a simpler headstock that qualifies as slotted.

By the way, that's my picture, and those are my basses! I like them.
 
Then you’ll be pleased to know they’re the first picture to pop up on a google search fir: “Ampeg scroll bass.”

It's a beautiful picture. I had it taken in 1997 by a local pro photographer, Don Hagopian, in his studio. I dusted off and posed the basses. I sure got my money's worth. It's become the classic Ampeg Scroll Bass photo.
 
The Riverhead Jupiter deserves a honorable mention for going half the way:

View attachment 3593298
Uh, symmetry issues aside, wouldn't the opposite arrangement have made more sense?
The problem with conventional headstocks is I have to raise my elbow to reach the bass-side tuning keys and turn them, while the treble-side ones are groundward-oriented, ergo comfortable to reach, as is; having (only) the bass-side slotted would make those keys easier to reach and operate at a non-awkward angle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cdef
Uh, symmetry issues aside, wouldn't the opposite arrangement have made more sense?
The problem with conventional headstocks is I have to raise my elbow to reach the bass-side tuning keys and turn them, while the treble-side ones are groundward-oriented, ergo comfortable to reach, as is; having (only) the bass-side slotted would make those keys easier to reach and operate at a non-awkward angle.
Then again:
if the bass being tuned is long-scale and hanging by a strap - typically onstage - the bass-side key-turning is done while holding the neck horizontally, keeping the elbow straight and having the hand, fairly comfortably, above the headstock: in that position, it's the treble-side tuners that become difficult to reach. So yeah, now that particular half-slotted headstock (as opposed to its opposite which I was advocating) is starting to make sense.
 

Latest posts